Ask your question ... sign up today! It's FREE!
Strategy     
 
This question has been closed, and points have been awarded.
Branding Vs. Corporate Image
Posted By: mjhct* on 10/28/2005 3:09 PM (CST) 250 Points
What is the difference between these two terms and the application of each?

Posted by: jlevin Member Response
10/29/2005 2:08 PM (CST)
Some people use them interchangeably, and they can, in fact, often overlap. Typically, corporate image refers to the overall impression you have of a company. Branding often refers to a specific product line (although not always) and are the essential attributes that come to mind when thinking of that product. Essentially, corporate image is used in a more general sense about a company, where branding is often used more about a specific product. This isn't a cut-and-dry rule, however, and the difference can be semantic.

Joy
 
Posted by: mjhct* Author Response
10/31/2005 10:42 AM (CST)
Thanks Joy;
I agree that the two are used interchangably, but I feel they are two very distinct marketing challenges. If one is going to differentiate between the two, it follows that you need to define each of them. So, I guess I am looking for is what marketing elements Branding entails, vs. those of a Corporate Image.
 
Posted by: jlevin Accepted Answer
11/1/2005 11:30 AM (CST)
I think a couple of examples might help explain. For the first example, let's take Toyota. Right now, their slogan is Moving Forward. It appears they are trying to project a corporate image of innovation, leading-edge technology, and quality. This slogan appears on all of their corporate communications, their website and all of the product brochures. It would seem, therefore, that they would be careful not to damage that corporate image by, say, sponsoring an event to promote fast food, or something. Anything that would go against an image of highest quality and innovation. However, if you look at one of their brands, there is a slight difference. For example, let's take Avalon. They try to equate luxury with this brand, in the features they point out of this brand, in the way they position the brand, and their frequent use of the word "luxury" when describing the brand. This is consistent with their corporate image of quality, but it takes a slightly different direction. You don't necessarily equate Toyota with a corporate image of luxury, but you do when talking about the brand of Avalon. Therefore, this brand would have appeal to the segment of the market who favor luxury when purchasing a car, with the quality and innovation of the corporate image behind the brand.

Now let's take the example of Avis. For a very long time, their slogan has been "We Try Harder". This image is conveyed in just about everything they do. They are proud to be #2 because they are constantly pushing to be #1 in their customer service, in their convenience, in their promotion, and in their product. They have been successful because you don't necessarily think of them as second rate, but as a company who pushes the envelope in a quest to be #1. They don't really have any individual brands - this is just an image you have of the company and the company as a brand and what their service is probably like.

Whether or not these images and brands are all successful in conveying these attributes are a different story. These examples are to show you how branding/corporate image can overlap and be interchangeable (Avis), versus how they can sometimes be distinct (Toyota). If a company has more than one brand, they will often use different brands to appeal to more than more market segment. However, there is usually some consistency in the brands they tie them overall together into the corporate image, so that one brand does not compromise the image as a whole. Instead they can leverage the brand to better exploit the corporate image, while also using the corporate image to exploit the brand. They are complementary.

Hope this makes more sense!
 
Posted by: mjhct* Author Response
11/1/2005 2:12 PM (CST)
WOW! That does it for me! Thank You, Joy
 


Get more answers ... ReTweet this!

Would you like to post a response?
Welcome to Know-How Exchange!
This is a collaborative community. We welcome everyone's participation.
All you need to do is login. Enter your account info in the box above (top right).
Not a member? Not a problem. Register here (it's FREE and EASY).




Know-How Exchange powered by MarketingProfs


Sponsored Links

Buy a Link Now

Just Released ... Download Today!
Just Released ... Download Today!
Look inside
User Name:
Password:
Remember Me
Forgot your password?

Top 25 KHE Experts
(Strategy)
ASVP/ChrisB (39399)
Jay Hamilton-Roth (37964)
mgoodman (33759)
mbarber (29493)
Frank Hurtte (25534)
W.M.M.A. (24591)
telemoxie (24052)
CarolBlaha (22078)
wnelson (18720)
Peter (henna gaijin) (17108)
NuCoPro (16186)
michael (16156)
stevea (13364)
thinkmor (10820)
PhilGrisolia=Results (10684)
SteveByrneBranding (9958)
Gary Bloomer (9531)
Puru Gupta (8985)
Deremiah *CPE (8318)
Wiglaf (8292)
SRyan ;] (7862)
darcy.moen (7712)
Pepper Blue (7080)
Mikee (6119)
Michele (5978)
Recently Posted Marketing Jobs
Senior Marketing Associate
Demand Generation Sr. Manager
Web Consultant
Director of Marketing & Community
Content Acquisition Manager
Marketing Manager
Senior Marketing Executive - ICIS Americas
Vice President, Marketing
[more jobs]

Join over 357,000 members ... SIGN UP!

My email address is and I'd like my password to be .

Already a member? Sign In!

My email address is , and my password is .


HACKER SAFE certified sites prevent over 99.9% of hacker crime.