Become a Member
Guides and Reports
Show All »
Metrics & ROI
Search Engine Marketing
More Marketing Topics »
See All »
Schedule of Events
Virtual Conference Series
Products and Services
Post a Question
Quick Start Guide
Find and Post Jobs
Real-World Education for Modern Marketers
Join Over 599,000 Marketing Professionals
Ask your question ... sign up today! It's FREE!
Just for Fun
MProfs PRO Seminar Q&A
Search more Know-How Exchange Q&A from Marketing Experts
This question has been answered, and points have been awarded.
Average Marketing Spend As % Of Revenue?
Posted by Anonymous on
9/15/2005 at 9:08 AM ET
I am interested to see if anyone knows of industry averages for marketing spend as a percentage of revenue for B-2-B and B-2-C companies?
9/15/2005 at 9:34 AM
Why do you need it?Selling spending including or not?
You will find enormous differences as per industry and as per company in each industry.The average will tell you nothing.You will find some companies spending 3% and some close 10 % of their revenues.
If ever you should look more at companies of your industry,stature and market position to size you up in this respect.
9/15/2005 at 12:24 PM
You're going to get a lot of answers that say looking for an industry average is wrong-minded, and I agree with that. Far too many variables in there. In fact, and allow the cynic in me to show through here, those numbers are generally used by ad agencies to pump up their clients' budgets.
Consider your question to begin with . . . B2B and B2C are not industries . . . they are, a generic description of the broadest of markets. Hotels and laundry detergent are both B2C, but they clearly have different markets and different ad budgets.
Second, such averages are usually compiled by talking to the biggest of companies--and Microsoft's and P&G's and Toyota's marketing as precentage of revenue numbers are irrelevant to a $5M company.
Third, what do you mean by marketing budget? Ad spend is what people usually mean, but that is hardly marketing, and many companies don't advertise at all.
Fourth, spend is going to differ within a company from product to product. For instance, Bose spends something like 20% of revenue for advertising on product A, and 50% of revenue on product B. It is bad statistics to then presume that their average spend is 35%
Do this instead.
1. Figure out who you want to reach with whatever it is you sell--assuming this is not just an academic question and you are with a company that has a product.
2. Determine what it will cost to reach that marketplace with a marketing initiative . . . figure in the strategic and tactical side of things: Consultant costs for things like pricing if you need it, trade show, print ads, and so on.
3. Ask yourself if you can afford that cost.
4. If yes, spend the money. If no, go to step 5.
5. Eliminate items from the list of marketing elements you want to use . . . until you hit a budget figure you can afford.
That's your marketing budget.
I know, people need some kind of benchmark to give them comfort when spending, but to approach marketing budgets this way does more harm than good.
9/15/2005 at 2:36 PM
You have a couple of great posts to build on - here's my experience: In the same company, with the same decision-makers, or bean-counters holding the purse-strings, different products/projects/initiatives will always get different amounts. It is not some vile, subversive plot, it is not back-stabbing and office politics, it is simply human nature.
The "champion" of a given product/project/initiative has to, above all, be a salesperson. How they sell, who they sell to and what type of broader support there might be for what it is they are selling, will determine what will be allocated to them. Throw in the additional factors of who might be backing the product/project/initiative and whether this is a main or parallel "thrust" for the company and things turn wilder still.
Looking at marketing spend as a percentage of revenue will not be able to "paint" the nuances I just described. In fact, in my experience, marketing spend will frequently change from planning, to early launch, to finish, depending on acceptance, and a host of other variables, so that complicates things even more.
Hope this helps,
9/15/2005 at 3:45 PM
As the others have said, the answer really is "it depends." Nevertheless, it is a question that is often asked by senior leaders, fiance directors, etc. as a way to benchmark.
If you are going to do this, of course, you want to be certain you are matching apples to apples, so having the average within your given industry would be the most helpful.
I don't know your industry, but here are a few articles that discuss marketing spend in a few different industries. If nothing else, they may indicate if you are way off base.
9/15/2005 at 9:14 PM
The average percent is so meaningless as to be absurd. The range is from 1% (or less) to something over 50%. Even if you had the number, it's totally useless ... perhaps even counter-productive, because the amount YOU need to spend depends on YOUR objectives, not on the "average" objective.
If I told you that the average temperature in the world today is 63.7 degrees Fahrenheit, would you know whether to wear shorts or a parka when you go outside tomorrow? Of course not.
You need to listen carefully to the posts above and spend what it takes to deliver the objectives you've set for yourself. If you can't afford that, then adjust your objectives. If you shoot for a percentage you're (a) just fooling yourself, (b) chasing the wrong target, and/or (c) going to end up with a marketing plan that will almost certainly be sub-optimal.
9/16/2005 at 12:22 AM
Ah yes, the old chestnut of the average spend.
I am reminded of the researcher who found the Average Australian has one testicle. This is apparently because roughly half of all Australians have none, while roughly the other half have two, you see.
So what does that tell us about the Average Australian? Not a lot, except perhaps that a man who has suffered the loss of a testicle in a croc-hunting accident, or when attacked during surfing by a Great White, is on one measure alone, still pretty average.
More to the point, I think, is the range of spends that might be occurring in relevant industries and businesses.
Even more important for you to consider - is how much the subject business needs to - and is able to - spend. And that depends entirely on its circumstances.
An upstart breaking into an established market may need to spend big in order to secure its target share.
An established player may need to spend much less to maintain its brand, and probably in different areas. Loyalty rather than awareness.
I don't think there's a better approach than looking at the "first principles" and how they apply in each case.
Hope this helps.
9/17/2005 at 2:39 AM
good suggestions so far,
the average spending depends on lot many factorslike
Type of Marketing,
and also whether you are a new company or in the business for long
your question doesnot specify anything about these if you provide details about these then we can help you more
hope this helps you
9/17/2005 at 9:49 AM
I think there are many valid ways to approach this question, and you seem to have some good advice above...
... this question has been posted many times before, and I'm always wondering why folks want that number. It seems to me that info might help us recommend a course of action.
I'm wondering - are you:
- A marketing manager trying to justify your existance?
- An ad agency trying to make a sale?
- A bean counter trying to cut expenses?
- A sales manager pushing for more hot leads?
- An ad agency sales person trying to select your market?
- An industry analyst evaluating public companies?
- A CEO trying to position your company for the long haul?
- A job hunter looking for your next job?
For example, if you are a marketing manager trying to justify your existance, you might find it helpful to try and get estimates or info on the activities of your competitors.
If you have some other specific need - if you can let us know more info about what that need is, we can probably provide even more information, or maybe we can suggest other ways to solve your specific problem or issue.
BACK TO TOP
Post a Comment
The Five Most Effective (and Ineffective) Words in Email Subject ...
by Ayaz Nanji
Which Digital Marketing Tactic Has the Biggest Revenue Impact?
by Ayaz Nanji
12 Secrets of the Human Brain to Use in Your Marketing ...
by Verónica Maria Jarski
What Motivates Customers to Make Recommendations on Social ...
by Verónica Maria Jarski
Three Steps to Writing a Stellar LinkedIn Profile Summary
by William Arruda
See more marketing articles »
MarketingProfs uses single
sign-on with Facebook, Twitter, Google and others to make subscribing and signing in easier for you. That's it, and nothing more! Rest assured that
provide your social data to 3rd parties
contact friends on your network
post messages on your behalf
interact with your social accounts
Your data is secure with