Last week for SocialTech early bird + save $100 more with code BEMINE. Register now »

Text:  A A
N E X T

A Fine Mess Caused by the Fine Print

Published on June 11, 2009  

"I was going to hire a company today to do something fairly simple that would have cost [an advertised] $45," begins a post at the Service Untitled blog. But there was a catch. "I called them to schedule an appointment and was told there was [an] $85 minimum service charge. The fact that I was a first time customer didn't matter. Essentially, I would have to pay $85 for a $45 service."

Here are some things to consider before you implement minimum service charges:

  • They have the potential to scare off customers, in no small part because they blatantly favor the interests of a vendor. "For the company," says the blog, "it's upselling disguised as a policy."
  • No one who plans to take action appreciates learning that information contained in the fine print nearly doubles an advertised price. "If you're going to have a minimum service fee," says Service Untitled, "at least be forthcoming about it and tell your customers exactly how much it is and what they can get for that amount in the very beginning."

The Po!nt: Over the relatively paltry sum of $40, this company lost twice: It sent a potential customer running and earned negative word-of-mouth in the process. "The most important thing to do," says Service Untitled, "is to think of the long-term value of your average customer."

Source: Service Untitled. Click here for the full post.


→ end article preview
Read the Full Article

Membership is required to access this how-to marketing article ... don't worry though, it's FREE!

WANT TO READ MORE?
SIGN UP TODAY ... IT'S FREE!

We will never sell or rent your email address to anyone. We value your privacy. (We hate spam as much as you do.) See our privacy policy.

Sign in with your existing account. Simply click your preferred account below!

Loading...


Connect with MarketingProfs on Facebook
NOTE: MarketingProfs does not allow its content to be lifted wholesale and republished elsewhere without a licensing agreement. For more information on copyright and licensing, see here.

Sign up for MarketingProfs Today ... it's FREE!

Get our best marketing tips daily—just enter your email address below to subscribe!

Rate this

Overall rating

  • Not yet rated
0 rating(s)

Comments

  • by Tim Thu Jun 11, 2009 via web

    While this example does seem mismatched -- $85 to get a $45 service -- there are indeed valid uses for intake or on-boarding fees. If these fees are raised intentionally to create entry barriers for undesirable customer segments, then it is a valid strategy. Angie's List is a good example. I'm sure that adopting a pay-to-play model helps cut down the reviews from people who just have a personal gripe or are professional flamers.

Join the World's Largest Marketing Community

IT'S FREE! Become a member to get the tools and knowledge you need to market smarter.

we respect your privacy.

Stay connected ... follow us!

Follow us on Twitter Join our LinkedIn community Find us on Facebook Subscribe to MarketingProfs RSS Feed Subscribe to MarketingProfs

More on Customer Relationships

Join over 434,000 members ... SIGN UP!

My email address is and I'd like my password to be .

Already a member? Sign In!

My email address is , and my password is .


Better Business Bureau Seal