Limited Time Offer: Save 30% on PRO with code GETRESULTS »

Real-World Education for Modern Marketers

Join Over 600,000 Marketing Professionals

Start here!
N E X T
Text:  A A

Online Research Traps That Can Derail Your Marketing Strategy

by Kevin Horne  |  
July 22, 2008
  |  7,652 views

It's hard to believe how different it was, just a mere 15 years ago, to conduct secondary market research. There was no Internet (commercial at least), no Yahoo portal, no Google search, no Web-accessible databases to tap. Almost every effort required a phone call, a trip to the library, a subscription to a third-party source, a read-through of hardcopy reference material.

How times have changed.

But, not always for the better. The seemingly bottomless pit of content that makes up today's Web poses some distinct challenges to marketers looking for precise, credible facts on which to build a strategy.

This article points out some of the online research traps—which can put your marketing strategy atop the proverbial house of cards.

Misleading Definitions


It is not uncommon for a data source to use imprecise terminology. My favorite example is the oft-quoted number of cell phone users in the US. You constantly see or hear 255 million, since that number is prominently displayed on the home page "ticker" of the wireless trade association CTIA.org. It seemed high to me, and when I contacted CTIA's head researcher, he admitted the number is for subscriptions, not subscribers.

When I later saw the 255 million number used, once again, in The New York Times April 13 "Week in Review" section, I requested a correction. The Times did its own research and two weeks later published a retraction, with a new number of 226 million.

Other data definitions to double-check include households vs. individuals, visits vs. visitors, total population vs. Internet users. These types of mistakes can really throw off your work in sizing market opportunities.


Sign up for free to read the full article.Read the Full Article

Membership is required to access the full version of this how-to marketing article ... don't worry though, it's FREE!

WANT TO READ MORE?
SIGN UP TODAY ...
IT'S FREE!

We will never sell or rent your email address to anyone. We value your privacy. (We hate spam as much as you do.) See our privacy policy.

Sign in with one of your preferred accounts below:

Loading...
Kevin Horne is an independent marketing strategist working with advertising agencies and interactive firms in NYC. His blog can be viewed at lairigmarketing.typepad.com.

Rate this  

Overall rating

  • This has a 4 star rating
  • This has a 4 star rating
  • This has a 4 star rating
  • This has a 4 star rating
  • This has a 4 star rating
3 rating(s)

Add a Comment

Comments

  • by Dan Soschin Tue Jul 22, 2008 via web

    My suggestion to those of you publishing results from your research is to also ALWAYS publish how the data was obtained and the full data set... this is especially true if your data shows something that is hard to believe.

    If you were shocked by the data, then chances are, so too will your audience. Site your sources and methodology so you can add credibility to your data!

  • by J Geibel Wed Jul 23, 2008 via web

    The article is a good start but the initial premise "marketers looking for precise, credible facts on which to build a strategy." is a bit off.

    Strategies aren't always "built" on facts - strategies are developed as a byproduct of a market vision, and market research is used to validate or shape the underlying assumptions.

    Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on how you look at it), marketing isn't accounting and often there aren't "facts" to support key assumptions in a marketing strategy - for example - there weren't any "facts" to support the use of personal computers when Apple introduced theirs in the late 70's. Nor were there any "facts" to support the use of cell phones when they were introduced in the mid-80's.

    What this means is that the unknowns in a strategy have to be clearly highlighted and monitored as the go-to-market strategy is implemented. Those assumptions will be either validated or disproved in the initial marketing efforts - and the strategy has to be adjusted in real time. That's why many market introductions are so tough.

    All this being said, the author brings out some good points about checking (and cross-checking) any "facts" that are published. There is a tremendous amount of misinformation and disinformation on the Internet and even published by major media (the fact checkers were laid off years ago). However, the Internet also makes cross-checking easier. My rule of thumb is to triangulate - I look for three sources that validate the "fact" or figure - and not ones that merely reference each other.

MarketingProfs uses single
sign-on with Facebook, Twitter, Google and others to make subscribing and signing in easier for you. That's it, and nothing more! Rest assured that MarketingProfs: Your data is secure with MarketingProfs SocialSafe!