This April Only: Save 30% on PRO with code ROCKETSCIENCE »

Real-World Education for Modern Marketers

Join Over 625,000 Marketing Professionals

Start here!
N E X T
Text:  A A

A Three-Step Approach for Linking Content and Behavior: Measuring Relevancy

by   |    |  10,588 views

Various studies over the years have examined the relationship between content relevancy and behavior. Almost everyone would agree that content must be relevant. But what is relevance? According to Wikipedia: "Relevance describes how pertinent, connected, or applicable something is to a given matter." A thing is relevant if it serves as a means to a given purpose.

In the context of this discussion, the purpose of content is to positively influence customer or employee behavior, such as increasing purchase frequency, purchase velocity (time to purchase), likelihood to recommend, productivity, etc.

When we ask marketers and others how they measure content relevancy, we often hear, "We base it on response rate." If the response rate meets the target, then we assume the content is relevant; if response doesn't meet the target, we assume it's not relevant.

Clearly there is a relationship between relevance and response. Intuitively we believe that the more relevant the content, the higher the response will be. But measuring response rate is not the best measure of relevancy. Many factors can affect response rate, such as time of year, personalization, and incentives. Also, in today's multichannel environment, we want to account for responses or interactions beyond what we might typically measure, such as click-throughs or downloads.

So, what is the best way to measure relevancy?


The best-practice approaches for measuring relevancy are many, and many of them are complex and require modeling. For example, information diagrams are an excellent tool. But marketers, who are usually spread thin, need a simpler approach.

The following three steps provide a way to tie interaction (behavior) with content. It's critical that you have a good inventory of all your content and a way to define and count interactions, because once you do, you'll be able to create a measure of relevancy.

The process and equation include the following:

  1. Count every single piece of content you created this week (new Web content, emails, articles, tweets, etc.). We'll call this C.
  2. Count the collective number of interactions (opens, click-throughs, downloads, likes, mentions, etc.) for all of your content this week from the intended target (you'll need to have clear definitions for interactions and a way to only include intended targets in your count). We'll call this I.
  3. Divide total interactions by total content created to determine Relevancy: R = I/C

To illustrate the concept, let's say you are interested in increasing conversations with a particular set of buyers. As a result, this week you undertook the following content activities:

  • Posted a new whitepaper on a key issue in your industry to your website and your Facebook page
  • Tweeted three times about the new whitepapers
  • Distributed an email with a link to the new whitepaper to the appropriate audience
  • Published a summary of the whitepaper to three LinkedIn Groups
  • Held a webinar on the same key issue in your industry
  • Posted a recording of the webinar on your website, SlideShare, and Facebook page
  • Held a tweet chat during the webinar
  • Tweeted the webinar recording three times
  • Posted a blog on the topic to your blog

We'll count those as 17 content activities.

For that very same content, during the same week, you had the following interactions:

  • 15 downloads of the whitepaper from your site
  • 15 retweets of the whitepaper
  • 15 Likes from your LinkedIn Groups and blog page
  • 25 people who attended the webinar and participated in the tweet chat
  • 15 retweets of the webinar
  • 15 views of the recording on SlideShare

That's a total of 100 interactions. It's likely that some of these interactions are from the same people engaging multiple times, and you may eventually want to account for that likelihood in your equation. But, for starters, we can now create a content relevancy measure:

R= 100/17 = 5.88.

Using the same information, had we measured only the response rate, we might have counted only the downloads and attendees—40 responses—so we might have had the following calculation:

R = 40/17 = 2.35

As you can see, the difference is significant.

By collecting the interaction data over time, we will be able to understand the relationship between the relevancy and the intended behavior, which in this example is increased "conversations."

I strongly encourage you to consider relevancy as a key measure for your content marketing. By tracking relevancy, you will be able to not only set benchmarks and performance targets for your content but also model content relevancy for intended behavior.


Join over 625,000 marketing professionals, and gain access to thousands of marketing resources! Don't worry ... it's FREE!

WANT TO READ MORE?
SIGN UP TODAY ... IT'S FREE!

We will never sell or rent your email address to anyone. We value your privacy. (We hate spam as much as you do.) See our privacy policy.

Sign in with one of your preferred accounts below:

Loading...

Laura Patterson is president and founder of VisionEdge Marketing. For 20+ years, she has been helping CEOs and marketing executives at companies such as Cisco, Elsevier, ING, Intel, Kennametal, and Southwest Airlines prove and improve the value of marketing. Her most recent book is Metrics in Action: Creating a Performance-Driven Marketing Organization.

Twitter: @LauraVEM

Rate this  

Overall rating

  • This has a 3 star rating
  • This has a 3 star rating
  • This has a 3 star rating
  • This has a 3 star rating
  • This has a 3 star rating
2 rating(s)

Add a Comment

Comments

  • by Rich Wed Nov 21, 2012 via web

    No s**t sherlock.

  • by Steven Wed Nov 21, 2012 via web

    I always dislike negative comments, especially those with a specifically non-contributing character like the one above.

    This stuff is so bluntly obvious to mister Rich here but he won't even add some of his superior knowledge to make things more interesting for us all?

  • by Ken Wed Nov 21, 2012 via web

    The formula is unclear. Is this a benchmark approach? Every time you post new content and we calculate each R per new content post how is R being weighed. What determines a good response rate or bad rate over time? The formula doesn't address time other than 'during the course of a week'. Of course there will be a spike in traffic in the initial few days because its new content. The formula doesn't include a 'given purpose'. Is the given purpose to attract unique new visitors or keep current tweet followers engaged in the brand with free white papers and other content. What does this relevancy exercise achieve?

  • by Elaine Wed Nov 21, 2012 via web

    Let's get back on the track of helping each other rather than the negative stuff. Ken asked some good questions - especially how can I use this to determine good vs bad relevancy rates over time? How do I factor seasonality into this as well? And, what if content was placed in the market several weeks ago but it is still well-read (likes, retweeted, etc). How do I factor that into the relevancy score?

  • by Terri Wed Nov 21, 2012 via web

    I found it interesting and worth sharing - I'm often surprised by how many people measure only the numbers of downloads and/or enrollees, instead of total interactions.

  • by Fritz Wed Nov 21, 2012 via web

    It seems as if the lower the score, the better. If I had a single "content activity" and 1,000 "content interactions", my score would be 0.001. Has anyone come up with a scale? What's acceptable, generally? Laura, have you been able to make use of this for your own organization? And if so, what are you seeing as trends, averages, etc.? Measurements like this are great ways to figure out how well the content group is working, and additionally, to compare employee performance. One could track ideas/output to this and determine the rockstars on the team. I want to second the time issue... as tweets get retweeted and facebook updates get shared, the life of some activities can last for weeks if the audience finds the content engaging.

  • by john Wed Nov 21, 2012 via web

    I like the idea of staticising your work. Moreso ,in this article,the list of ways of increasing your conversation is appreciated.

  • by Jackie Bitutu Tue Nov 27, 2012 via web

    Hi, I like this model. I updated my website and sent out an sms broadcast and was able to measure this. This has been an area of pain for me but I'm now beginning to understand measurement of content relevance. Thank you.

MarketingProfs uses single
sign-on with Facebook, Twitter, Google and others to make subscribing and signing in easier for you. That's it, and nothing more! Rest assured that MarketingProfs: Your data is secure with MarketingProfs SocialSafe!