Real-World Education for Modern Marketers

Join Over 600,000 Marketing Professionals

Start here!
Text:  A A

A 12-Point B2B Positioning Health-Check

by Lawson Abinanti  |  
December 5, 2016

Editor's note: This article is based on a post on the author's blog.

A positioning health-check will tell you how effective your B2B positioning really is—and B2B marketers desperately need a realistic way to judge their positioning effectiveness.

Although 69% of 137 respondents to a survey I'm conducting think they are doing a good job of positioning, many are kidding themselves. I did health-checks on 24 websites of respondents who judged their positioning to be "effective" or "very effective," and found that only six are doing it effectively. The other 18 websites are doing a marginal or poor job of positioning.

Why the disconnect? One reason may be that there has been no objective, standardized way of evaluating positioning effectiveness.

But now you can conduct your own positioning health-check by answering the questions listed below. The health-check overcomes preconceived notions about positioning effectiveness and gives you a proven way to realistically perform an assessment.

First, though, let's dig a little to see what else might be at the root of the problem.

Why B2B Marketers Might Not Be Positioning Effectively

Another reason survey respondents might think they are doing a good job of positioning is that they don't realize it's not something done seat-of-the-pants. Only 44% of respondents have a formal process for positioning; 68% either learned positioning on the job or by trial and error. Very few learned it in college.

Sign up for free to read the full article.Read the Full Article

Membership is required to access the full version of this how-to marketing article ... don't worry though, it's FREE!


We will never sell or rent your email address to anyone. We value your privacy. (We hate spam as much as you do.) See our privacy policy.

Sign in with one of your preferred accounts below:


Lawson Abinanti is the founder of Messages That Matter. For 15+ years he has helped mid-market and enterprise software companies stand out with messages that matter to B2B buyers.

LinkedIn: Lawson Abinanti

Rate this  

Overall rating

  • This has a 5 star rating
  • This has a 5 star rating
  • This has a 5 star rating
  • This has a 5 star rating
  • This has a 5 star rating
1 rating(s)

Add a Comment


  • by Peter Altschuler Mon Dec 5, 2016 via web

    Positioning is multi-faceted. It functions for the company on one level and for its products on another (and each product may be positioned separately and differently, depending on the market and the competition). A chemical that's sold to one industry as an ingredient might be sold to another for its stand-alone properties. A business that sells supplies to restaurants using one set of attributes might sell to cruise ships using a different set.

    In both cases, the company's brand -- it's positioning, promise, and characteristics -- might be consistent, but it's presence in marketing might be modified. A company that's selling a complete product may give its brand identification more dominance while one selling a component part in a price-driven environment may give theirs less.

    I've used product-specific positioning statements for decades, outlining what the product is, who it's for, and how it provides a unique benefit (or set of benefits) that distinguish it from competitive offerings. Often, the same product will have multiple positioning statements because the target and the benefits for that target are different. And I've even had to re-work those statements if they veered from the attributes associated with the brand.

    So positioning is a moving target, and it's not the statement that's important, unique, or beneficial. It's the product or service it describes in the context of the target buyer's needs, expectations, and perceptions.

  • by Ford Kanzler Mon Dec 5, 2016 via web

    Excellent! I'd add:
    - When you survey customers, competitors or others in your market and they begin identifying your brand with language that sounds very similar to your positioning statement, its a good indication that you've begun nailing your desired position vs. competitors. (The position lives in the mind of the market." Thank you Al Ries & Jack Trout!)
    - Develop no more than three key messages (customer value points) supporting your positioning claim and use them consistently either separately or together in all your outbound messages. Don't keep inventing additional key messages. People can' remember more than three things.
    - Police your positioning (your communications strategy) to assure that its not being reinvented by others. This requires on-going effort. There is a strong tendency for people in other departments, office locations or your communications agencies to go "off-road" and dream up quire different, off-strategy communications. Creativity should be governed by the strategy.
    - When developing new tactics, first ask, "Does this align with, reinforce our strategy and support how we want to be known in the market?"
    - Most importantly, is the business "walking the talk?" Is the company being and doing what it says it wants people to perceive and value about the brand? A great example of this is the outdoor equipment supplier Patagonia

  • by Neil Mahoney Mon Dec 5, 2016 via web

    Excellent analysis. My "15 Commandments for a truly aligned Social Media, Marketing, Sales Process" provides a similar solution.

  • by Peter Altschuler Mon Dec 5, 2016 via web

    Ford, those are all valuable considerations. They provide useful reference points that (should) help keep everyone focused on what's most important.

    Yet companies need to take a r-e-a-l-l-y long view to develop a position that will last. That takes, I admit, a degree of clarivoyance that a revenue-by-quarter world doesn't always appreciate, but it's essential. A brand has to consider potential changes in the market, in the emergence of competing new products or services, and in people's behavior and endeavor to create an over-riding idea that can survive them all.

    Alternatively, companies have to be ready to re-position themselves. Apple had done that brilliantly when Jobs was at the helm, either hammering home the notion of simplicity and reliable functionality or introducing technology that no one realized they needed until it was unveiled. That remained from the introduction of the iMac through the iPod, iPhone, and iPad, the last three intuiting what consumers would want to do if they had the tools to do it. That's a synthesis that not every company can accomplish (and Apple seems to have lost the skill, jettisoning product categories that could have been consolidated into a unified entertainment/information/IoT management system).

    It's not easy. Not everyone has a single, enduring product like DeBeers ("A diamond is forever"). Mercedes Benz went from "The best engineered car in the world" to the competitor to "The ultimate driving machine," never coming up with a durable alternative. Nike triumphed with a simple, three-word concept that encompassed all forms of activity, and no one else in the category has come close to matching it.

    Yet if those firms have to adapt to new trends that hint at needing new technologies, they'll have to make changes, and "the ultimate self-driving machine" just ain't gonna work.

MarketingProfs uses single
sign-on with Facebook, Twitter, Google and others to make subscribing and signing in easier for you. That's it, and nothing more! Rest assured that MarketingProfs: Your data is secure with MarketingProfs SocialSafe!