Limited Time Offer: Save 30% on PRO with code WOOHOO »

Real-World Education for Modern Marketers

Join Over 600,000 Marketing Professionals

Start here!
Text:  A A

Consumers Want Print Magazines, but Also Relevance

June 17, 2010

Despite major shifts in the publishing world—including dramatic declines in print ad revenues and numerous closures of print publications—consumers still want to read print magazines: 92% say they plan to stick to print; and when given the choice of print, e-reader, or online delivery, 90% still prefer print, according to a survey from the CMO council.

Just 17% of magazine readers surveyed prefer to read electronically, and 9% prefer some form of e-reader device.

Among such readers, 24% say they intend to eventually switch over to an e-reader, whereas 67% say they want to physically hold their magazines, even though they acknowledge the e-reader has its place. Some 9% already read magazines on an e-reader.

Below, other findings from Leveraging Loyalty to Transform Publishing by the CMO Council, which examines the topic of relevance in publishing and advertising.

Although 59% of readers say most of the content in the magazines they subscribe to is relevant to them, just 27% say all the content is relevant. Still, 14% say they increasingly they find content to be untailored to their interests—causing them to read less than half of those magazines.

Though editors strive to provide readers with a steady stream of relevant content and information—regardless of channel—57% of magazine readers say the only personalized aspect of their print-magazine experience is their name printed on the mailing label.

Most readers say they are not tapped for their own preferences: Only 30% have ever been surveyed about content they would prefer reading.

Sign up for free to read the full article.Read the Full Article

Membership is required to access the full version of this how-to marketing article ... don't worry though, it's FREE!


We will never sell or rent your email address to anyone. We value your privacy. (We hate spam as much as you do.) See our privacy policy.

Sign in with one of your preferred accounts below:


Rate this  

Overall rating

  • This has a 5 star rating
  • This has a 5 star rating
  • This has a 5 star rating
  • This has a 5 star rating
  • This has a 5 star rating
2 rating(s)

Add a Comment


  • by susan Fri Jun 18, 2010 via web

    Excellent information - especially since we are reviewing our marketing communications/advertising strategy and how to incorporate all the social media tools into it. We have a variety of ages in our marketing team and there is a definite distinction between the older vs. younger relative to the viability of print vs. online tools. This information provided some good statistics that we can use in development of our strategy and also points to the fact that we are not too far behind realtive to integrating social media into the mix - especially since we are in the healthcare space, which is quite conservative. Thanks!

  • by Tue Jun 22, 2010 via web

    Great Information and insight. I just wanted to be sure to note the sponsors of this report since it was not included - InforPrint Solutions Company. I always try to reference my work and Know you do too :)

  • by Thu Jul 22, 2010 via web

    I see that the study says people prefer print ads, but I don't see it in the B2B trade pubs. I still get a few subscriptions but there are no more than 10 advertisers per issue. Without paid advertisements, they will not survive. So while the study is well documented, I just do not see the B2B trade publication results - those publications are razor thin!

    Now I can definitely see the value of "consumers" saying this - The Oprah Magazine and Sports Illustrated are a different animal that B2B pubs.

MarketingProfs uses single
sign-on with Facebook, Twitter, Google and others to make subscribing and signing in easier for you. That's it, and nothing more! Rest assured that MarketingProfs: Your data is secure with MarketingProfs SocialSafe!