Today only: enroll in any one course for just $1 with code OPENHOUSE11. Hurry, offer expires at 11:59pm ET

Real-World Education for Modern Marketers

Join Over 600,000 Marketing Professionals

Start here!
Text:  A A

Three Alternatives to the Permission Gamble

January 12, 2011  

In a post at Email Marketing Reports, Mark Brownlow considers the argument that opt-in permission isn't strictly necessary. "The definition of spam has shifted broadly from 'email not asked for' to 'email that is not wanted,' implying that relevant [or] valuable email will not be considered spam," he explains.

But you're making a mistake, he warns, if you believe all nonsubscribing recipients will have the same reaction to your messages—however relevant they might be.

"The more you move away from the permission optimum (explicit opt-in), the greater the proportion of your list who will see your emails as spam," he says. "Improving the relevancy/value of those emails will compensate in part for permission sacrifices, but it clearly won't eliminate all 'this is spam' reactions." And remember—ISPs tend to be even less forgiving.

Brownlow recommends that, instead of taking a permission gamble, you adopt strategies like these for higher-volume campaigns:

→ end article preview
Read the Full Article

Membership is required to access this how-to marketing article ... don't worry though, it's FREE!

Take the first step (it's free).

Already a registered user? Sign in now.


Rate this  

Overall rating

  • Not rated yet.
MarketingProfs uses single
sign-on with Facebook, Twitter, Google and others to make subscribing and signing in easier for you. That's it, and nothing more! Rest assured that MarketingProfs: Your data is secure with MarketingProfs SocialSafe!