This April Only: Save 30% on PRO with code ROCKETSCIENCE »

Real-World Education for Modern Marketers

Join Over 624,000 Marketing Professionals

Start here!
N E X T
Text:  A A

Reputation Management for New Media

by   |    |  1 view

A strong brand helps to communicate that a company and its offerings are relevant and uniquely able to meet customer needs. Most companies today pour millions into brand-building campaigns to generate that external awareness, which in theory can speed up the sales cycle. This has become the accepted norm, taught to us by the very advertising agencies we hire.


But all this great awareness can come crashing down on you with one reputation disaster online.
Good and bad reputations are opposite sides of the brand coin. And the ability of consumers today to share their opinions of your brand with just a click of a mouse levels the playing field for all and puts your brand in constant peril.
A solid reputation reflects the partners you do business with, the strength of your management team, your company's financial performance to date and, ultimately, the types of employees you hire and will hire in the future. But literally millions of customers and prospects engage in social communities on the Web today. Facebook alone has 50 million community members, with over half of them logging in daily! Couple that with the ease and ability to create a quick video or podcast, or post a negative comment on a blog, and you have a recipe for reputation disaster.
Unfortunately, when a reputation disaster occurs, it is becoming more difficult for your PR team to execute using the usual crisis management playbook, because the type of media, placement of media and approach to each medium differs. This fragmentation means it will become increasingly difficult to neutralize criticism and restore reputations when something happens.
Additionally, the Internet already has built-in, automatic reputation ranking systems. Currently examples are Google for companies and eBay for vendors. These ranking engines are quickly becoming extremely effective ways for people to determine how reputable your company is before deciding whether to do business with you.
The bottom line: As media continue to fragment with the explosion of yet more social networks, aggregators like Google will become increasingly important in helping users decide whether or not to do business with you.
So what is a company to do?
I recommend a three-step approach to reputation management called "MRO":
1) Monitor .... Companies should designate an employee or hire an external service to monitor, moderate and drive positive discussions.
2) Respond .... Technical staff should be designated to respond to any product or support issues that arise from communities and take the lead in responding with action plans to any negative sentiments that develop.
3) Optimize .... Companies need to proactively optimize their reputation online over time by exploiting the positive aspects of their brand (an example here is GE, whose Ecomagination is demonstrating the company's commitment to keeping the environment clean).
Each MRO element is designed to give you a point person for this reputation-protection trifecta:
Monitor gives you a way to see and engage in conversations before they get out of control. People will be a lot more polite online when they know you are listening. The challenge is learning about conversations that arise quickly. This is where you need reputation bulldogs, who can be out there watching all the time.
Respond gives you a dedicated point person internally who can talk about your product or service with authority and provide clarity on how you might resolve an issue. As I said above, this should be a technical person rather than a communications person. This will convey the company's commitment to address the issue.
And finally, Optimize. Optimizing your reputation in the marketplace means you go beyond just keeping it on track. You invest in the online aspects of your reputation just as you invest in other dimensions of your brand.
Having a strong brand doesn't mean you have a strong reputation. Ignoring this critical factor is a risk that companies can't afford to take today.


Join over 624,000 marketing professionals, and gain access to thousands of marketing resources! Don't worry ... it's FREE!

WANT TO READ MORE?
SIGN UP TODAY ... IT'S FREE!

We will never sell or rent your email address to anyone. We value your privacy. (We hate spam as much as you do.) See our privacy policy.

Sign in with one of your preferred accounts below:

Loading...

Paul Dunay is director of global field and interactive marketing for Bearing Point (www.bearingpoint.com).

Rate this  

Overall rating

  • Not rated yet.

Add a Comment

Comments

  • by Paul Barsch Fri Jan 25, 2008 via blog

    Paul, side note for readers of your post today. There's a HBR case study on this topic (Dec 2007). I recommend it.

  • by Lewis Green Fri Jan 25, 2008 via blog

    Paul, Excellent post! I agree completely. Brand and reputation remain about trust and credibility.

  • by fletch Fri Jan 25, 2008 via blog

    I agree with Paul. Thank you, Great post.

  • by Elaine Fogel Fri Jan 25, 2008 via blog

    Interesting, Paul. As more and more of these new marketing areas emerge, the greater the need for organizations to hire internal or outsourced specialists.

  • by Paul Dunay Sat Jan 26, 2008 via blog

    Elaine I agree, I think there will be an emerging role in companies to track their Reputation - perhaps we will see the Chief Reputation Officer someday!

  • by Yuce Zerey Sun Jan 27, 2008 via blog

    Thanks Paul, really value added post. This post triggered me to think PR 2.0. PR is based on new media, considers mass collaboration.

  • by Dusan Vrban Mon Jan 28, 2008 via blog

    Paul, do you see a difference in basic concepts to the reputation management in new/old media? I'm thinking if MRO concept you are proposing (or anything simmilar) isn't actually a "must" for companies - no matter if we talk about new or old media? I see your post a bit as a core marketing management concept applied to new media - analyse, develop, monitor, optimize? I like it! :-)

  • by Paul Dunay Mon Jan 28, 2008 via blog

    Dusan I think it is the emerging "rule" going forward. With the way that media is fragmenting (old/new, blogs/communities etc) the MRO concept or anything like that is becoming the new standard.

  • by Ty Graham Fri Feb 1, 2008 via blog

    Blip'd is a PR 2.0 engine.

  • by Megan Soto Sun Feb 3, 2008 via blog

    Thanks so much for delving into this topic and encouraging an aggressive approach to new media when not only dealing with branding, but also with reputation which seems to become a secondary pursuit in some cases.

  • by mike ashworth Thu Feb 7, 2008 via blog

    Paul, for the monitor part of the three items you have listed their is a very effective tool called brandwatch from www.magpie.net Their is great little demo on the site too It looks very impressive. Mike Ashworth Business and Marketing Coach Brighton and Hove, UK

MarketingProfs uses single
sign-on with Facebook, Twitter, Google and others to make subscribing and signing in easier for you. That's it, and nothing more! Rest assured that MarketingProfs: Your data is secure with MarketingProfs SocialSafe!