Real-World Education for Modern Marketers

Join Over 600,000 Marketing Professionals

Start here!
Text:  A A

What Others Like (and Dislike) About Your Tweets


Twitter users* say only 36% of the tweets they receive are worth reading, 39% are mediocre at best, and 25% of tweets are not worth reading at all, according to a study by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University, MIT, and Georgia Tech.

The findings are based on a survey of 1,443 Twitter users who rated 43,738 tweets during a 19-day period (Dec. 30, 2010 to Jan. 17, 2011) from the accounts of some 21,014 Twitter users they collectively followed. The research was facilitated by the site "Who Gives a Tweet?"** 

Among those surveyed, Twitter content was deemed "not worth reading" for various reasons. Tweets that were part of someone else's conversation, or updates around a current mood or activity, were the most strongly disliked, whereas tweets that included questions to followers, information sharing, and self-promotion (such as links to content the writer had created) were liked more often. 

Below, additional findings from the study titled "Who Gives a Tweet? Evaluating Microblog Content Value," conducted by Paul André, post-doctoral fellow in Carnegie Mellon's Human-Computer Interaction Institute, with Michael Bernstein and Kurt Luther, doctoral students at MIT and Georgia Tech, respectively.

Among all types of tweets analyzed, "Presence Maintenance" tweets (e.g., "Hullo twitter!") were the most strongly disliked, registering a 45% probability of being Not Worth Reading (NotWR), compared with 18% for "Question to Followers" tweets.

Presence Maintenance communications were generally considered "content-less," among those surveyed, eliciting comments such as "I have one word for one word tweets: BORING", or "useless."

The following chart shows various tweet types and respondents' attitudes toward them:

"Conversational" tweets and "Me Now" tweets (current mood or activity updates) were also strongly disliked. 

In the table, Presence Maintenance is the baseline condition. For example, Question to Followers tweets were 2.83 times more likely to be rated Worth Reading (WR) instead of Neutral, compared with a Presence Maintenance tweet:

Twitter reviewers were asked to rate individual tweets as WR or Not WR; they could also qualify their rating with one of the following eight reasons: arrogant, boring, depressing, mean, funny, exciting, useful, or informative

Being boring was a far more prevalent problem among tweets evaluated.

Among 17,557 ratings tagged with a reason, tweets that were informative (48%) and funny (24%) were most likely to be rated WR (green chart on left), whereas tweets that were boring were most likely to be rated NotWR (82%).

Boring tweets rated NotWR tended to repeat old news, were often cryptic, or used too many # and @ signs, according to study. Boredom was also associated with banal or prosaic tweets, leading to responses such as "and so what?" or "it's fine, but a bit obvious."

Key Takeaways

Below, the researchers' recommendations for improving tweet content based on the evaluations returned: 

  1. Old news is no news: Information rapidly gets stale on Twitter. Followers quickly get bored of links seen multiple times. 
  2. Provide context: Tweets that are too cryptic leave readers unable to understand their meaning. Simply linking to a blog or photo, without giving readers a reason to click on it, was described as "lame."
  3. Limit Twitter-specific syntax: Overusing #hashtags, @mentions, and abbreviations makes tweets hard to read. Some syntax is helpful: if posing a question, adding a hashtag helps everyone follow along.
  4. Keep it to yourself: The clichéd "sandwich" tweets (e.g., "what I'm eating") about pedestrian, personal details were largely disliked. Reviewers reserved a special hatred for Foursquare location check-ins.
  5. Don't whine: Negative sentiments and complaints were hugely disliked. 
  6. Keep it short: Twitter limits tweets to 140 characters, but followers still appreciate conciseness. Using as few characters as possible also leaves room for longer, more satisfying comments on retweets.
  7. Go professional: People* may often follow you to read professional insights and can be put off by personal gossip or everyday details.

*Note on respondents: Many users to the site "Who Gives a Tweet?" were referred by technology-focused and business websites (e.g., TechCrunch, Mashable, and CNN), as well as a link distributed via Twitter. Though the survey sample size was substantial, the demographic of respondents is likely skewed toward those who visit such sites.

**Twitter users who visited the site were promised feedback on their tweets if they agreed to anonymously rate tweets by Twitter users they already were following. 

About the data: The analysis is based on data from December 30, 2010 to January 17, 2011. Some 1,443 visitors to the study's site rated 43,738 tweets from the accounts of 21,014 Twitter users they followed. 

Join over 600,000 marketing professionals, and gain access to thousands of marketing resources! Don't worry ... it's FREE!


We will never sell or rent your email address to anyone. We value your privacy. (We hate spam as much as you do.) See our privacy policy.

Sign in with one of your preferred accounts below:


Rate this  

Overall rating

  • Not rated yet.

Add a Comment


  • by Peter Martino Mon Feb 13, 2012 via web

    I find the "Ratings of 4220... " graph with the 3 different color bars a little confusing. It would seem to indicate that "random thoughts" and "self promotion" ranked high as "worth reading".

    Can anybody clarify?

  • by Scott A Mon Feb 13, 2012 via web

    Peter, I'd be willing to bet that the intersection of "Random Thoughts" and "Funny" is where you get that 35% positive rating.

  • by Mary Schmidt Mon Feb 13, 2012 via web

    It depends on who's tweeting. I love pretty much anything I read from The Bloggess. And, I love CraigyFerg. However, for biz, that's a different story. Don't waste my time, and I'll do my respect you too. .

  • by Mary Schmidt Mon Feb 13, 2012 via web

    I obviously have been spending too much time on Twitter. I can't even write a complete sentence. Above should be, I'll do my best to respect you too.

  • by Digital Media Business Consultant - Software as a Tue Mar 6, 2012 via web

    Spending too much time on social network without much return is the most acknowledged fact. Use social network as engagement tool rather than terminal of sales point.

MarketingProfs uses single
sign-on with Facebook, Twitter, Google and others to make subscribing and signing in easier for you. That's it, and nothing more! Rest assured that MarketingProfs: Your data is secure with MarketingProfs SocialSafe!