Real-World Education for Modern Marketers

Join Over 600,000 Marketing Professionals

Start here!
Text:  A A

Top B2B Firms Gaining 230% More Leads via Social Media Than Peers

March 29, 2012

Best-in-Class B2B companies generate on average 17% of their leads from social media channels, roughly 230% more marketing-generated leads than other companies (5%), according to a new report by Aberdeen Group, which examines the social marketing strategies of top-performing B2B companies.

In the new report, titled "B2B Social Meeting Marketing: Are We There Yet," Aberdeen uses four key performance criteria to distinguish the Best-in-Class (top 20% of aggregate performers) from the Industry Average (middle 50%) and Laggard (bottom 30%) organizations.

The top 20% of companies (i.e., Best-in-Class) have achieved the following performance metrics:

  1. Average annual company revenue growth of 20%, compared with 8% for Industry Average and -3% for Laggard firms.
  2. 10% average year-over-year improvement of marketing leads resulting in closed business, compared with 3% for the Industry Average and -1% for Laggard firms.
  3. 44% of sales-forecasted pipeline generated by marketing, compared with 10% for Industry Average and 5% for Laggard firms.
  4. 73% annual customer retention rate, compared with 27% for Industry Average and 7% for Laggard firms.

Overall, 84% of all surveyed B2B companies are using social marketing in some form.

However, Best-in-Class companies are more likely to use social media primarily for lead-generation purposes, and more likely to integrate social marketing with other core channels and processes, the study found.

Below, additional findings from Aberdeen Group.

The Diminishing Influence of the Traditional Sales Cycle

Digital and social media have created an asymmetrical relationship between buyers and sellers, according to Aberdeen.

Sign up for free to read the full article.Read the Full Article

Membership is required to access the full version of this how-to marketing article ... don't worry though, it's FREE!


We will never sell or rent your email address to anyone. We value your privacy. (We hate spam as much as you do.) See our privacy policy.

Sign in with one of your preferred accounts below:


Rate this  

Overall rating

  • Not rated yet.

Add a Comment


  • by Thorsten Strauss Fri Mar 30, 2012 via web

    Great article ! Insightful and useful.

  • by Jeff Rozic Tue Apr 3, 2012 via web

    Excellent study by the Aberdeen Group- huge thanks to them and Eloqua and Silverpop for sharing some great data.

    We do indeed notice the trend, and it's unmistakable. "Best in class" B2B companies- as written above- are very much integrating social strategies into their multi-channel marketing efforts. Obviously we are advocates that they should. That is, look at social as a whole as a critical channel in a multi-channel strategy. And within social, adopt a cross-network approach as well- driven especially by customer/client behavior. Facebook has definitely bridged B2B- many B2B companies have really effective Facebook pages and the new Timeline layout resets the playing field. But YouTube, Twitter, Instagram and other channels each serve their purpose, too- especially for targeted B2B campaigns.

    Email and social are so naturally complimentary; we're really excited to continue to see how B2B companies extend their email strategies into the social realm.

    Thanks again for a great read.

    Jeff Rozic

  • by Freddy J. Nager Wed Apr 4, 2012 via web

    One should never calculate the percentage difference between two percentages. That's what Darrell Huff in his classic book "How to Lie With Statistics" would call "statisticulation." Calculate differences in absolute values to gain true insights.

    If you want to look at percentages, note that even the "Best In Class" companies are still getting 83% of their leads without the help of social media.

    What I want to know is whether the social media has increased their overall number of leads, can they prove it, and what did it cost them in terms of time, money and opportunity costs. If they had invested that same amount into traditional means, what would their results be?

    Social media can help B2B companies. It has certainly helped mine. But let's not statisticulate to make it sound more fantastical than it really is.

  • by Christopher Simpson Mon Apr 9, 2012 via web

    @Freddy: Seriously? You're actually going to insist that good, solid mathematical principles be applied to anything having to do with social media marketing? Good luck. You're a brave man and certainly don't deserve the pain of being torn apart by hordes of angry marketing gurus.

  • by Yasmin Wed Jun 6, 2012 via web

    This is great insight! These metrics are astounding.

    I have 2 points to make:

    (1) I think the best-in-class companies have really invested in a social media strategy and obviously a resource infrastructure - inhouse or outsourced - to make this happen. Otherwise I don't believe you can achieve this kind of metric. That means big budget, which seems to paying off.

    (2) I wonder who the B2B companies are both best-in-breed and other, if they are big brands? its easy for big brands to garner such metrics from social, much more difficult for companies that have smaller brand equity and don't have the brand buzz/name out there already.

    B2B is not the same across the board - the business model is so different for each comany. I wonder if any are in technology space.

    Guess I will have to buy the report to find out ;-)

MarketingProfs uses single
sign-on with Facebook, Twitter, Google and others to make subscribing and signing in easier for you. That's it, and nothing more! Rest assured that MarketingProfs: Your data is secure with MarketingProfs SocialSafe!