Become a Member
Guides and Reports
Show All »
Metrics & ROI
Search Engine Marketing
More Marketing Topics »
See All »
Schedule of Events
Virtual Conference Series
Products and Services
Post a Question
Quick Start Guide
Find and Post Jobs
Real-World Education for Modern Marketers
Join Over 598,000 Marketing Professionals
Ask your question ... sign up today! It's FREE!
Just for Fun
MProfs PRO Seminar Q&A
Search more Know-How Exchange Q&A from Marketing Experts
This question has been answered, and points have been awarded.
Importance Of Being #1 Or #2 Brand In A Category
Posted by Anonymous on
4/25/2005 at 6:06 PM ET
Why companies should build positions to compete in segment with #1 and #2 positions?
If a company is #3 what strategy do you consider they should take?
A big company with leader brands in diferent categories, should consider rationalize those brands that are not #1 or #2? What benefits would obtain?
Peter (henna gaijin)
4/25/2005 at 6:17 PM
In general, the leaders compete by saying they own the category. They say that the smaller company can not do it all.
Smaller companies compete by trying to segment the category further and take ownership of that niche. They say that the bigger companies do not have the focus on that niche, so are not as good at servicing that niche.
Does the #3 take the smaller company tact? Maybe. If the market is personal computer operating systems, and the #1 is Microsoft, even #2 is very far behind, so would focus on their niche. This is what both Apple and Linux do.
But if the market is online travel, no one company has a large market share (or even leadership) and the top half dozen or so all compete as if they were the leader. In this case, the strategy for #3 should probably be consolidation (partner or acquire a competitor).
4/25/2005 at 7:05 PM
Remember Avis? "We try harder". In this instance, they clearly took advantage of their position. They knew they were not market leader. Yet, in their advertising, they presented value, pricing, service against the BIG Guys, insinuating that you do not get service, price, value simply because they are too big.
"At Avis, we try harder"...to earn your business.
What would you like for us to do?
You tell us what you want, we will provide it.
4/25/2005 at 9:49 PM
To add to what Randall, my esteemed colleague, has stated about the Avis story, here is an excerpt from an article I wrote on the subject:
“Quantifying territorial claims is at the heart of the theories espoused by Reese & Trout (R&T;) in the early eighties. To illustrate, R&T wrote, "An important early success in the positioning era was the famous Avis campaign". Here R&T provided a ladder hierarchy model with the first rung reserved for the first brand territorial claim. In the Avis story the ladder represents the rental car market as a category. Hertz owned the first territory, or top rung on the ladder. In 1962, Avis claimed the number two territory or second rung with its slogan, "We're number two, we try harder". It was the first time a company had declared itself as number two.
R&T wrote, " Many marketing people have misread the Avis story. They assume the company was successful because it tried harder." Any company could claim to be trying harder. National Car Rental, the number three car rental company, could claim to be trying harder. "Trying harder" as a claim harkens back to the "unique benefit" strategy days of marketing.
What was unique about the Avis story was Avis' claim of being number two. Avis staked a claim of territory that no one else could own as long as Avis defended it. National could say, "We're number three, we try even harder", but that wouldn't work in the third spot. It would just be copying Avis with a lesser claim.”
Link to article:
hope this helps,
4/25/2005 at 10:44 PM
Very often, the #1 and #2 brands do not need to sub-segment their categories. They can appeal to the broadest audience and, to a degree, define the category.
All the other brands need to find a niche and become #1 or #2 in their niche(s).
Read Ries and Trout's book, "Positioning: The battle for your mind." It explains much better than I could in a few dozen, or even a few hundred, words.
BACK TO TOP
Post a Comment
The Five Most Effective (and Ineffective) Words in Email Subject ...
by Ayaz Nanji
12 Secrets of the Human Brain to Use in Your Marketing ...
by Verónica Maria Jarski
Three Steps to Writing a Stellar LinkedIn Profile Summary
by William Arruda
Six Content Marketing Myths—Busted
by Sandra Stewart
Seven Email Innovations to Bring Context to Your Campaigns
by Catherine Magoffin
See more marketing articles »
MarketingProfs uses single
sign-on with Facebook, Twitter, Google and others to make subscribing and signing in easier for you. That's it, and nothing more! Rest assured that
provide your social data to 3rd parties
contact friends on your network
post messages on your behalf
interact with your social accounts
Your data is secure with