Question

Topic: Strategy

What Do You Think About My Usp?

Posted by Anonymous on 500 Points
Here the USP of the business product:

"Your success is under your control in agile projects with our innovative full-scale project management"

Our company is a custom software developer. We have a unique toolkit for project management. This toolkit applies professional and full-scale project management principles and methods to small and compact projects.

What do you think about USP?
To continue reading this question and the solution, sign up ... it's free!

RESPONSES

  • Posted on Member
    Hi, Yegor

    Thank you for posting your question. Your USP messaging is not as clear is it could be. I reread a few times in an attempt to decipher the gist of your communication.

    Another idea:
    Full-Scale Project Management for Smaller Projects

    Let me ask you this first though before trying to develop a more targeted USP. What is the advantage offered by the full-scale project management to the smaller-scale agile project? Do users tend NOT to use a project management tool/toolkit for smaller projects?

    Another Idea:
    New, Easy to Use Project Management Toolkit for Small Projects

    Let's try to pull out the tangible benefits of your custom software and then develop a more targeted USP :)

    Look forward to additional info/post to better help you.

    Marketing-Riot
  • Posted by CarolBlaha on Member
    Its a good tagline or descriptor, but its not a USP. The USP might be the "innovative full-scale project management" if it is unique to your firm and not something a competitor can say. Remember you probably will have many USP's. You are selling solutions and not "one size fits all". So the USP that might jazz one client might not jazz another.
  • Posted by Jay Hamilton-Roth on Member
    Your success is under your control... - This is vague

    ...in agile projects... - I would capitalize Agile, since it's a product owned by Oracle. I might even ™ Agile to make it clearer what you're talking about.

    ...with our innovative... - Too vague

    ...full-scale project management - Full-scale? Does that mean you're the only company providing such feature/benefit?

    Like others have mentioned, I'd encourage you to focus more on the benefit of using your software, not the mechanics.
  • Posted on Author
    Thanks for the responses, they really help. Could you please tell me how shall I evaluate the USP? What are the criteria? How can I understand that USP is good or it is bad? And for whom? For me, for my customers?

    I do appreciate your responses, but I would like to be able to align them with some "main concept" behind the USP. Maybe some link?

    Thanks!
  • Posted by CarolBlaha on Member
    I googled what is a "unique selling proposition" (also called point) and got thousands of hits. Here is one that explains it simply. https://www.profitadvisors.com/usp.shtml

    A USP is a differentiator. Its why someone would choose you vs a competitor. Its something your competitor would not be able to say "me too".

    When I run meetings to find USP's, I have the group just call things out and start writing on a board or use large post its. You can brainstorm on your own. Why do people choose you vs your competitor?

    Typically they tell me "great service" or prices. Those are not differentiators in most industries-- people expect good prices and great service. But don't discard any right now. Just keep drilling -- then start eliminating.

    If a competitor can say "me too", its not a differentiator.
  • Posted by wnelson on Member
    Just a note: If you want to know if your USP is effective, you should ask your customers, not a bunch of marketing people. Unless we happen to be project managers familiar with large and small scale projects and project management tools, we aren't going to have much to go on to determine if the USP hits home except use of exciting language, perhaps.

    Having had experience in past lives as an engineering manager for large and small scale projects, I can try to put myself back into that role and provide you with an example of how you may determine a USP.

    First, in small scale projects, the “project manager” is usually a person who has multiple roles. As a project manager, management has task him/her with the role of leading the other team members in keeping the project on track. In addition, management wants regular updates on how things are going. On top of that, he/she probably is a resource and has tasks to perform for the project. So the project manager has to run around checking on everyone, having team meetings to make sure everyone is communicating with each other, attend management meetings to tell management everything is OK, update the project plan, formulate and send out reports in several different forms and degrees of detail, AND actually get something done. Most times, a project manager feels he’s working for the project management tool versus the tool working for him/her.

    The next thing is that project resources don’t think in terms of percentages of tasks being complete and don’t work on one task at a time or even one small project. They find it hard (and wasteful) to break down a task the way the tool wants them to. To complicate this, some tasks don’t have a finite outcome. In development, an engineer might run several experiments and the results will determine which way to go for the future of the project. Project tool doesn’t capture this and thus the project plan becomes incomplete or has to be reformulated later – more administrative burden!

    Further, as a project manager, the ISO9001 guys bother me for process reporting detail. A good tool would help me with this as well.

    From this experience, when I hear your tool ”applies professional and full-scale project management principles and methods to small and compact projects”, I begin to think that I’m going to have a NASA-like tool to feed and my first task for the project will be to create days with more than 24hrs! Scary!

    So, if you are going to satisfy my pain uniquely, the USP may take the following form:

    ”A project management tool that provides for control and reporting without bureaucracy and burden”

    This USP gets the emotional attention of your customers. After you have their attention, you should be able to point to features in your tool that support this:

    o SimpleUpdate ™ - SImpleUpdate works in the background of a resource’s workstation with other tools to capture a real-time status. By monitoring the use of tools and results, SimpleUpdate will sense task endpoints automatically. Additionally, the resource and hit hot keys and bring up SimpleUpdate and report progress through simple check sheets.

    o FlexiReport ™ - With FlexiReport, project status is available in real time. Project, functional, and corporate managers and team members can acquire reports as needed or on regular intervals. Report details can vary from Gantt charts, PERT charts, action item lists, or memo status reports. Formats are available in plain text, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, or HTML.

    o FuzzyTasks ™ - FuzzyTasks allows for multiple paths for the project to be created based on results of a task. When the FuzzyTask completion is reported, SimpleUpdate asks for the result and then automatically reformulates the project. Optional inputs for a FuzzyTask allow for input of probabilities for outcomes to allow for “most likely,” best case, and worst case estimates of project duration and critical paths.

    o ProjComm ™ - ProjComm allows for setup of bulletin boards and capturing of instant messages between project members. Project managers can monitor these communications. Items can be selected to go to FlexiReport for reporting purposes.

    o ProjectSemantics ™ - ProjectSemantics allows for standardization of task names and process flow for ease of continuous improvement and demonstration of compliance to ISO9001 standards. Additionally, ProjectSemantics speeds project plan formulation through use of dropdown text selection for task names.

    Obviously, I don’t know if your tool has any of these features or that your target customers even want or need them. But, what you can see is that by understanding the pain and needs of your customers, you can formulate a succinct USP to address their pain. The USP gets their attention. Then, you can match the supporting features around that to show how you resolve that pain and meet their needs.

    I hope this helps.

    Wayde
  • Posted on Member
    I find your USP too jargony, and worse it doesn't actually tell me anything. What is so innovative? How is my success under control? What are agile projects, the Oracle product or do you mean projects that are "agile"?

    Do you competitors not apply professional and full-scale project management principles and methods to small and compact projects? If they don't, that's a USP. If they do, then there nothing all that unique about it.

    Instead of trying to be catchy, use clear, plain language and really tell people what makes you unique. It doesn't have to be boring, just crystal clear.
  • Posted on Author
    Again, thank you for your comments! They are very helpful and I'm glad I'm using this website for my marketing needs. Please, take a look at this:

    USP:
    "Success is under your control in agile projects with our innovative full-scale project management"

    How it works:
    You hire us for your fixed-price agile project as a general contractor;
    We do project management, using our online management toolkit;
    We build and manage a distributed team of narrow-skilled technicians;
    Our toolkit implements all project management activities required in full-scale projects;
    You control project status by 200+ primitive and 7 cumulative metrics;
    The toolkit and metrics are compliant with PMBOK, CMMI, RUP, and ISO-9001;
    Key metrics and methods are our proprietary patented innovations.

    Benefits:
    You get full-scale project management without bureaucracy and burden
    You don't pay salaries, equipment, or burned, just fixed-price
    You access all project status details without redundant communications
    You can pick-up the best suitable skills and talents through one contractor
    You get continuous integration, TDD, and self-documented code, among other agile benefits

    I show here the explanation of the product and some key benefits the customer gets. Combining them all together I created USP. What do you think?
  • Posted by wnelson on Accepted
    Thanks for clarifying. So you're a turn key custom software development house that works on a fixed price - correct?

    I'm still not in agreement with the USP. It seems to be complicated and convoluted. For turn key custom software development, I want fixed price - yes. That's not so unique, however, among your competitors. I also want fixed time and delivery of code that meets requirements - all things I'd expect from any custom project. You are delivering all the metrics - yes. That you follow a process is good. Again, I'd expect that from any software house I'd hire. But as a purchaser, I really am not so concerned with the inner workings of the project and having internal control. All I want is my software on time and working. Especially if this is a small scale project.

    However, again, I strongly stress - ask your clients about your USP! They are better experienced to tell you what you bring that is unique and of value.

    Wayde

Post a Comment