When a private company publicizes the results of its own research study, how do we know it's for real and not just self-promotion...?
As a contributing writer to The Business Journal, my editor recently asked me to write an article based on the results of a study conducted by a private training company. She had received a news release about the topic in question and I contacted the media contact - a publicist - who then turned me onto the company's principal.
The study's results were intriguing and would certainly have been excellent fodder for the meat and potatoes of the article. When I asked for a copy of the study, the principal sent me links to pages on the company Web site that showed the study's brief summary results.
When I asked for a copy of the full study (so I could extrapolate findings of my choice and to verify the existence of the study), I never heard back. Responses to my inquiry, up to that point, had been fairly swift, but once I asked for the full study, that was the end of communication.
Now, in all fairness, it's possible that something happened. Maybe the principal got kidnapped by a cannibal tribe on a business trip to a third-world country, or maybe his laptop got run over by a bus. Hey, I'm open to any number of simple explanations why I never heard from him again.
But, I admit to feeling duped. This study had apparently been mentioned in countless articles in major national business publications, so I thought it had to be bona fide. Maybe I'm being cynical, but what if it wasn't? What if it was a sham - a way for this company to promote itself with data many business people would find fascinating? What if the study was non-existent, or conducted with fewer participants than would typically be acceptable? I wonder, with all the studies and news releases that flourish at major publications, do reporters always fact-check?
In the end, I didn't use the study as part of the article. I couldn't ethically include the information without having some sort of confirmation that it was real. I did interview local experts on the subject and used other published statistics.
I'm curious to know what you think about this. Do you think I overreacted or was I right in passing on the study's results?
Continue reading "Private Research Studies: When Are They the Real Deal?" ... Read the full article
MarketingProfs provides thousands of marketing resources, entirely free!
Simply subscribe to our newsletter and get instant access to how-to articles, guides, webinars and more for nada, nothing, zip, zilch, on the house...delivered right to your inbox! MarketingProfs is the largest marketing community in the world, and we are here to help you be a better marketer.
You may like these other MarketingProfs articles related to Content:
- How to Build Trust With Data Visualization: Caroline Jerome on Marketing Smarts [Podcast]
- How Employee Advocacy Can Improve Your Content Marketing Performance
- Storytelling in B2B: Bobby Lehew on Marketing Smarts [Podcast]
- No Time to Create Content? Turn One Webinar Into Nine Marketing Pieces in Less Than 14 Days... Without Killing Yourself
- A 17-Step Process for Creating High-Performing Articles [Infographic]