Question

Topic: Strategy

Legal Options: Collecting Lost Software Revenues

Posted by Anonymous on 500 Points
BACKGROUND: A client uses software at no charge and pays no maintenance. Simply put - we've had a long-term consulting relationship with this client and as part of that consulting relationship the use of software has been provided FREE as a verbal condition. Neither party executed a written arrangement concerning cost or right of use for the software. As a result the client does not legally “own” the software. It is confirmed that it is being used.

STRATEGY: My company has spent one month of due diligence attempting to schedule a discussion of this situation with the client. By completely ignoring contact and providing veiled threats, the client has encouraged my firm to initiative legal activity.

STRATEGY MOVING FORWARD?: My company needs to clearly define how we wish to handle this situation. Should we utilize legal mechanisms with the intent that this action may lead to resolution via arbitration? What legal mechanisms are available to us? What legal mechanisms are available to them? Who has a stronger position and why?

WHAT IS IT WORTH?: Estimated lost license revenue is nearly $400,000. Total lost maintenance fees are 20% of license revenue annually over the course of 10 years.

THE QUESTIONS: What is the client’s legal right to continue using the software without paying for licenses or maintenance? What action should my firm take pursuing legal recourse to re-coup losses? Should my company send out a Cease & Desist (C&D) letter? Should my firm initiate a software audit? What can we expect to hear from the client's legal response? Can this situation be handled without destroying the business relationship that we have built?
To continue reading this question and the solution, sign up ... it's free!

RESPONSES

  • Posted by Blaine Wilkerson on Member
    I think JB has nailed it, and Gary certainly confirms it, as do I . Unless you have some kind of WRITTEN and/or traceable documentation that clearly states the use of the software was intended for temporary/trial use, you are stuck in the mud.

    Now Since this person is still a client, do they provide any retainers for other services? Have they been advocates of your firm and sent you other clients who DO pay for the software? Basically, I'm suggesting you look at whether or not you have seen some kind of return for allowing free use. If so, can you drop it?

    Now, cutting them off as a client may be your only way to show an end to the original verbal agreement. Of course, the consequences are obvious - no more client, less revenue, one less advocate, and now you would be paying a lawyer (or moderator) several thousand dollars to fight with an even more disgruntled entity.

    The other side of the coin, if you threathen to deactivate the software somehow (and actually do it), and this harms THEIR business, YOU will be the ones defending yourselves in court.

    The only other way I can think of at the moment would be drop the issue for now and implement some kind of software upgrade that requires a product key or code (or something only the paying clients possess) in order to keep the software activated. It has to be corporate-wide...something cheap and easy...and HAS to be required of all your customers. Perhaps a new "Security Patch" or the like. Give the "free" client notification that they will need to buy the software in order to get the "update", or everything stops running.

    Now if you do not operate on an ASP model, and the users can simply install it and use it. There is still a way. You mentioned 20% in lost maintenance fees. This implies that a service tech still goes out to thier facility. Have the service tech install the "patch" on his/her next call (and make sure EVERY customer gets the patch as well). The patch will have a 30-day "self destruct" bug if a product code is not entered (or something else only the paying clients possess). Make the reminder pop up on every screen for 30 days! With the other clients, the tech simply installs the patch and immediately de-activates it with the client code. With your "problem", they are now calling you asking you to fix it. You can defend yourself by saying EVERY client had the upgrade and the policy is universal.


    This "patch" could be just enough to legally qualify as a patch (it could be a new font option or password protect screen...something EASY and cheap for the programmers to create and duplicate). Going about it "on the sly" may be cheaper than hiring an attorney, losing a client, and risk getting sued yourself.


    Of course, if they bring you a lot of business, let 'em keep it and write off the loss as a business expense (and this will justify lobbying for a bigger Christmas bonus )!!!

    Something to chew on. I hope this helps!

Post a Comment