Topic: Strategy

How Valuable Are Client Case Studies?

Posted by AriRose on 500 Points
My company has a policy not to use client names on testimonials, whether they be in print or on the website.

Over the past year I have conducted and written 4 client case studies regarding my company's human resources consulting services, and intend to write more. They can be viewed at However, my boss is now asking me to remove the names of the case studies as well. I am reluctant to do so, so I ask:

1. How valuable are well-written case studies in the first place?

2. Do case studies with no personal name or client information hold any value at all? Would: "Cardio Medical Clinic", and "Executive Director" have any credibility, or must the actual client name be used?

Any insights to this dilemma would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

To continue reading this question and the solution, sign up ... it's free!


  • Posted on Accepted
    I have a suggestion. If you can't or do not want to put names and company names, find out if you can put a footnote stating that prospects who are considering your company for a project may, with the person's permission, be given the actual names and companies. This procedure may get more of your clients to agree to let you do a case study.
  • Posted by Inbox_Interactive on Accepted
    I think well written case studies are very valuable. Not only are they of interest to the site visitor, but also they can be very valuable from a search engine optimization point of view.

    I would say that a case study with complete disclosure would carry with it a little more credibility than one that is blind. Only if the client name was well known in the industry or by the reader would it make much difference. (At least that's my opinion.)

    However, if the option is between a blind case study and no case study, then the blind option is still preferable.

    It's a balancing act, for sure, because even if the client agrees to use names (company and personal), you have to be sure you're comfortable giving your competition a prospect list.

    If you really want to know if the case studies matter, you could check your site's analytics. You could also offer readers the opportunity to rate the case studies. (Was this case study of interest? How could it have been better? And so on...)

  • Posted by CarolBlaha on Accepted
    I like case studies. With or without the written documentation-- one of the ways I add my value is to share how others have best used my product and services.

    There could be a few reasons your boss wants to delete the names. They may not want their clients bombarded with unsolicited calls asking for further info. A client may not want the implied endorsement. Or, a client may want compensation. I had a company do work with Disney and wanted to do a case study-- feedback was that was ok, but for a $1Mil.

    The names of the clients are not the story. Its about finding solutions, making money or saving time for the client. It'll be fine.

    Sell Well and Prosper tm
  • Posted by AriRose on Author
    All the clients I have spoken to thus far are fine with using their name. The problem is my boss who is concerned their names will be made public for the competition.

    If "blind" case studies are used, how much would you estimate their value is dminished, as compared to full disclosure?
  • Posted by CarolBlaha on Accepted
    I do not feel it is diminished at all.

    Your boss has a valid, but over exaggerated point. Yes, it does give a competitor a list of his clients. But in reality, there are "no secrets" and any rep worth their salt knows who the target customers are, and who they buy from. Your clients have already been called on -- and will continue to be targeted by your competition.

  • Posted by Frank Hurtte on Accepted
    Research shows that customers who publically say... your product is great.. stay sold longer and better than those who do not make such a statement.

    If you want to really, really establish loyalty, ask the customer to explain in detail -why you are better.

    I like case studies. People like to read them. My books and articles always provide case study information. Either generic.. when the customer is concerned about giving away (his) competitive advantage. Or named when they are not.

  • Posted by Peter (henna gaijin) on Accepted
    I also think case studies are very valuable, particularly for consulting business (where you aren't selling a physical product). In consulting, you are only worth the value you can bring in to your client. Case studies help reassure prospects that what you are offering has had value for others, and likely would have value for that prospect.

    The more data (specifically customer names) in the case study, the more believable it is. Ones that are genericized (using description of client, not names) can work, but are not as powerful as one with names (but more useful than nothing).

    I have trouble understanding why your manager doesn't want to use names? Usually the challenge is getting the people named in case studies to be willing to let their names be used, not some sort of rule from inside your company.
  • Posted by AriRose on Author
    Thanks for the insights.
    Marcus - you took the words out of my mouth! I used the exact argument with management - instead of worrying about marketing using names, worry about why you are worried in the first place!

    Of the options above, I would say #2. We are very good at what we do, with customzied service. But we are small and losing a client to competition would certainly hurt.

    Bottom line - do I put up a fight to keep the names, or drop the names and keep the case studies generic? (the studies won't come down completely...)
  • Posted by mgoodman on Accepted
    Don't fight it. Just use a generic description of the client in the case study and move on to more important things.

    It's not quite as good, but if you have a good story to tell the name of your client is less important. Make sure the case study lesson is clear and that you're on solid footing content-wise.

    Find something else to fall on your sword over. This isn't worth the fight.
  • Posted by CarolBlaha on Accepted
    I can only re-post and I feel strongly by this. I totally agree with mgoodman-- read his post with an open mind. Pick your battles. I can tell by your feedback you feel strongly about your opinions and mine does not align with what you want to hear.

    I have a different background than many of these seasoned marketeers-- my focus/experience is in the trenches actual sales. I use sales literature as a tool-- and also know how literature can hinder a sale. Besides your boss's concern that competitors can read their clients-- it gives a prospect to say "I know this company and my biz is different so it won't work".

    I also know, as a salesperson the tools I want and need. The value of case studies is in the solution you provide. Using as you stated "cardio clinic" will give your salesperson the tools they need. People buy solutions. You won't dilute your message.

    Again, I know and appreciate the time you put into making your message so compelling. Just keep an open mind.

    Sell Well and Prosper tm
  • Posted by AriRose on Author
    I want to thank each of you for your insightful replies. I am comforted to hear that many of you do not think removing client names will significantly impact the value of the case studies. As mgoodman said - I'll find something else to fall on my sword for. Thanks.
  • Posted on Member
    A quick add to this string...The value of an unnamed case study is directly proportional to how you plan to use the story. For sales, as Carol said, unnamed does the job of documenting your results and offering proof points. However, for getting PR in your industry, editors want case studies that name your customers.

    It's always best to leverage every story in as many ways as you can, so naming names allows you to use it in PR too. That kind of exposure can be huge.

    Casey Hibbard
    Compelling Cases

Post a Comment