Question

Topic: Research/Metrics

Research Budget As A % Of Total Mktg Spending

Posted by Anonymous on 475 Points
Hi guys,

does anyabod have some benchmark figures concerning how much large FMCG business spend on marketing research as a percentage of their total marketing spend?

I'm think of renowned best-in-class such as P&G (I sort of rememeber they spent more than 5%...) but I need more opinions.

Thanks in advance!
To continue reading this question and the solution, sign up ... it's free!

RESPONSES

  • Posted by Peter (henna gaijin) on Accepted
    Market Research or R&D-type research?
  • Posted on Author
    we are talking about marketing research, not R&D :-)
  • Posted by mgoodman on Accepted
    I've spent enough time at large FMCG companies (including P&G) to be able to answer your question, but any answer I give you is bound to be misleading and potentially damaging.

    The amount you spend on market research depends entirely on what you're trying to learn, what the information is worth, and what you're going to do with it.

    There are brands that spend almost nothing, and there are brands that spend almost 100% (e.g. a new brand or start-up). So if you try to average them all, you'll get a dog's breakfast.

    Let's step back and understand what you're really trying to learn and what you're going to do with the information if/when you get it. We're here to be helpful, but if I told you the answer is 4.35%, I'm not sure there's any way that would really help.
  • Posted on Author
    Hi mgoodman,

    don't worry, I know that every company is different and that 'averaging out' differences has some issues but I just need this figure to make a point.
  • Posted by mgoodman on Accepted
    In that case, use 4.35%. It's as close as any other figure, and nobody will be able to prove you wrong!

    P.S. Because the actual cost of market research is not a function of the size of the marketing budget, the percentage is generally lower for large brands with big marketing budgets, and larger for smaller brands with more limited budgets. it's also higher for companies with an active new product focus, and lower for companies that have mostly cash cows.

    Again, the range is enormous ... from less than 1% to more than 50%.

    And if anyone asks where you got the figure, please don't use my name! :)
  • Posted by koen.h.pauwels on Accepted
    Michael is right; it all depends and a number close to 5% but sounding more exact will probably fit your purpose.

    About that purpose, do you want to:
    a) tell your company/client it should be spending up to X% of its marketing budget on marketing research
    b) assess the total potential for the marketing research industry in eg the US ?

    As we are drawing numbers from our hat, you may also want to use the guidelines in Markstrat (a marketing strategy simulation game by StratX): there you typically want to spend 5%-10% of your advertising budget on marketing research, more if it is for a new market (anybody remembers Vodites?). Because the numbers in the game are based on empirical generalization from academic research, they may have some authority :-)

    Cheers
  • Posted on Author
    guys, while we all agree on the fact that budget for marketing research shouldn't stem purely from a mathematical formula, having a benchmark in mind (bonus points if it's from your same industry) isn't such a bad idea.

    Benchmarks shouldn't be taken at face value for many different reasons but still, if your industry is at 5% and you are at 50%...you should probably wonder why your level of spending is so different...

    Also: while the amount of spending on research is not a direct function of your marketing budget, unless your company is either very big or very small, there should be a close link. The more you do, the more you need to test/explore.

    Anyway, thanks for more or less confirming the figure I had in mind :-)
  • Posted by mgoodman on Accepted
    One of the problems with this is that some companies include the cost of syndicated data (e.g., Nielsen, IRI, et al.) in the market research budget and some don't. And in many cases, those syndicated data costs are substantial.

    Further, some companies have a dedicated market research person (or department), and they may or may not include the cost of that in the market research budget.

    Ditto with the cost of smart analytics, to answer key questions using available data (including sales and customer data).

    And companies with multiple brands in the same category may be able to split the cost of market research among the brands, so that the percentage of total marketing spending allocated to market research is lower for each brand (and thus lower as a percentage of the total marketing budget).

    When you put those altogether, the average is truly a meaningless number ... somewhere between 0.5% and 50%. (I have a start-up client whose 2010 marketing budget was 95% market research. They're in the average too.)

Post a Comment