So in the last post, I talked about retailers lies and how they reverberate and why marketers should not lie....
And in response to one of the comments on the post, I said our responsibility as marketers is to go beyond telling the truth about products and services and to be honest about the way in which we communicate.
So this current post is the other shoe dropping, the confession, the session with my shrink. You see, what is sacred in direct response creative is getting the response. Nothing else counts. Most people who hire me to write copy for lead or customer acquisition do not care about relationship building; they want the phone to ring, traffic to their sites, lots of mail coming in.
The problem is that, in most cases, the only way to deliver what is sacred to the marketer is to deceive the consumer. In direct mail, what works best now to generate response are "Official" envelopes. We get consumers to believe they are receiving official and important documents with a variety of copy and graphics tricks. These include words and phrases like "Confirmation" with a serial number following; "Control Number" with a UPC; "APPROVAL GRANTED. Contingent upon Addressee Acknowledgement Prior to XX/XX/06"; envelopes imitating the format the IRS uses; and so on. In most cases, the envelope does not disclose who the mailer is.
The "official" deception continues inside the envelope, but generally only long enough to get the reader into copy about the actual product or service being promoted. Again, relatively few marketers apply deception to their products or their offers.
Now the interesting thing, and it's not a cop-out, is that, even in the "Age of Disbelief," consumers of all stripes and business people, too, are swallowing these deceptions time and time again. They're opening the envelopes (and emails by the way) and even though many are repelled by the deception, enough are responding to the promotion and buying from it. That doesn't make deception right; it just makes it very difficult to be a heretic and say, "No, I won't deceive for the sake of response."
As Alexander Pope said, "Oh what a tangled web we weave, When first we practice to deceive." (Sorry, that was very deceptive of me. It sounds like it's Pope, but it's actually Sir Walter Scott.)
Did you like this article?
Know someone who would enjoy it too? Share with your friends, free of charge, no sign up required! Simply share this link, and they will get instant access…
Know someone who would enjoy it too? Share with your friends, free of charge, no sign up required! Simply share this link, and they will get instant access…
Content Articles
You may like these other MarketingProfs articles related to Content:
- The Anatomy of a Compelling Market Story
- How to Win the Deals You Can't See—A B2B Content Strategy for the AI Era: Q&A with Ariana Keil
- Creating Content B2B Decision-Makers Believe In (And Act On): Q&A with Melanie Deziel
- What's Missing From Your B2B Content: Q&A with Belinda Weaver (Part 2)
- What's Missing From Your B2B Content: Q&A with Belinda Weaver (Part 1)
- Three Attention-Grabbing Story Structures (That Aren't the Hero's Journey)