Practical and functional Web sites rarely win prizes for design, but they do win sales and make profits....
Recently, I did a masterclass on Web sales with about 50 Danish Web managers. I gave them a list of issues and asked them to choose the most important ones for them. The top 5 issues for these managers were: increase sales, customer-focused, usability, completing the sale, serving customers better.
Then I asked them to look at the list again, and this time choose the issues that were of least importance to them. These were: credit card fraud, more use of Flash, award-winning site, Wow factor, more animation.
The Danes (and other Scandinavians) are probably the most sophisticated Web practitioners I have had the pleasure to deal with. When I deal with countries that are at the bottom of the curve when it comes to Web adoption and ecommerce expertise, award-winning sites driven by Flash and Wow factors tend to be top of the agenda.
"I no longer enter my agency's layouts in the contests by the art director's societies, for fear that one of them might be disgraced by an award," David Ogilvy wrote in his 1963 seminal book, Confessions of an Advertising Man. This legend of advertising stated that, "I wage war on art-directoritis, the disease which reduces advertising campaigns to impotence."
Inspired by David Ogilvy's wisdom, I decided to visit Ogilvy.com. There I was presented by another quote from the great man:
"You aren't advertising to a standing army, you are
advertising to a moving parade."
And right underneath that quote, Ogilvy.com is boasting about how it has just won 13 awards.
In fact, rarely have I come across a more vain, conceited homepage. In about 110 words, the name Ogilvy (or Ogilvy & Mather) is used over 20 times. Other phrases include "our work" and "what we do."
Nathan Shedroff recently gave a talk at User Interface 11, where he asked the audience to name areas of life where good design has made a real impact. (Nathan is the co-author of a book on
experience design called Making Meaning.) Design innovations (uch as wireless, voting systems, nutrition fact sheets, starting a car) were mentioned.
Nathan mused that they could spend an hour mentioning really important design innovations and have a very long list. In his opinion, nothing on this list would have won a design award.
Nathan showed an image of the iPod, that he described as a white block with rounded corners. Absolutely functional design. Just like the Google homepage.
The Danes understand that a site needs to be designed for the customer, not for the organization, and certainly not for the Web team. The most dangerous thing that web professionals can do is assume that what they really care about is what their customers really care about.
The Web is a functional, practical place. A great Web site drives the customer to act. It uses clear, substantial language, rather than clever, meaningless words. To quote David Ogilvy again:
"When Aeschines spoke, they said, 'How well he speaks.' But when Demosthenes spoke, they said, 'Let us march against Philip.' I'm with Demosthenes."
The shiny surface wins awards. Real substance wins customers.
Continue reading "Why Award-Winning Web Sites Are So Awful" ... Read the full article
MarketingProfs provides thousands of marketing resources, entirely free!
Simply subscribe to our newsletter and get instant access to how-to articles, guides, webinars and more for nada, nothing, zip, zilch, on the house...delivered right to your inbox! MarketingProfs is the largest marketing community in the world, and we are here to help you be a better marketer.
You may like these other MarketingProfs articles related to Content:
- Five Ways Your Content Might Be Sabotaging Your Account-Based Marketing
- How Grammar Mistakes Influence People's Perceptions of Companies
- Is Your Content Working? How to Measure Content Marketing Results
- The Three New Rules of Content Experience
- Marketers' Biggest Struggles With Freelance Content Creators