In the final season of AMC's Mad Men, during "The Monolith" episode, Harry Crane, the agency's media buyer, demands that the firm purchase him a computer. The computer of which he speaks could be considered one of the earliest examples of ad tech.
A 1969 Harvard Business Review article described the computer as being capable of performing data analysis that would "enable businesspeople to make informed decisions about whether to hold inventory; expand plant production; rent, buy, or borrow; increase production; and examine the effects of anomalies on demand or the effects of constraints."
As the computer is being assembled—in the process taking up an enormous amount of space within the agency's offices—we come to understand its thematic significance: it symbolizes the coming change in the role of creatives, the Don Drapers of the world. These creatives up until then made decisions based on gut feelings and instinct, not needing to create space for new tech-savvy math men and their machines. "The IBM 360 can count more stars in a day than we can in a lifetime," exclaims the technician installing the computer.
"But what man lay on his back counting stars and thought about a number?" Draper retorts.
Many creatives lack an understanding of analytics
I thought of this scene as I wandered through the booths at this year's Marketing Nation Summit, a marketing automation conference put on by Marketo. Though I was amazed by the technical and analytical prowess displayed by many attendees, there was a noticeable dearth of conference goers who worked on the creative side of marketing—the graphic designers, videographers, and writers who actually produce the content.
My observation highlights a pervasive problem within my industry: Many creative content producers lack even a basic understanding of the analytics side of their work, and, because of this, they are unable to make informed decisions about the kind of content that drives client and customer acquisition.
You may be the world's greatest designer with a masterful command of UX and UI, but if you don't understand all the downstream effects of how consumers touch your product, your skillset is too isolated.
Here's what creatives should know
Now, I'm not arguing that a creative should understand every facet of every marketing automation tool, especially as there are so many out there. (At one point, we realized we had a dozen SaaS automation programs touching my company's marketing, most of which we tried once and then discarded.)
I do think, however, it's incumbent upon everyone within the industry to understand the basic underlying principles and framework of marketing tech. Even if you don't understand SEO to a technical degree, a journalist or copywriter should at least know basic keyword and headline practices, so they can optimize their articles for widespread consumption.
A creative might respond to this argument by claiming that you can't automate great content, that in regards to high-level branding and capturing consumer mindshare, you can't simply push a button on HubSpot and out pops a brilliant piece of copy.
To a certain extent, he'd be correct; a really great piece of content will take care of itself, and then the analytics and tracking is just telling you how awesome it is as opposed to whether it worked. The home runs are still home runs, and whether it's a 430-foot home run or a 475-foot home run doesn't really matter.
The value in marketing automation can be found in the day-to-day content, which makes up the bulk of the content created for a company. Not all articles are going to be read by 50,000 people, and so when you write something for an audience of a few hundred or even a few thousand consumers, analytics-based, automated tweaks can lead to a doubling of ROI.
A creative who can only hit a home run once every six months is less valuable than one who can consistently, on a day-to-day frequency, hit singles and doubles. This is why pitting creatives against math men is a false dichotomy. One is meant to enhance the efficacy of the other.
After all, the best marketing automation in the world is completely useless without the very creative content worth automating.
Continue reading "Why Creatives Really Should Know About Marketing Automation" ... Read the full article
MarketingProfs provides thousands of marketing resources, entirely free!
Simply subscribe to our newsletter and get instant access to how-to articles, guides, webinars and more for nada, nothing, zip, zilch, on the house...delivered right to your inbox! MarketingProfs is the largest marketing community in the world, and we are here to help you be a better marketer.
Sign in with your preferred account, below.
You may like these other MarketingProfs articles related to Career Management:
The Average Compensation of B2B Tech CMOs
Chief marketing officers in the B2B technology sector receive between $240,000 and $350,000 in annual cash compensation (salary plus bonus), on average, according to recent research from 6sense. read this »
How the C-Suite Views the US Economy and Hiring Climate
Most C-suite executives at enterprise companies are bearish about the United States economy, according to recent research from West Monroe. read this »
The Average CMO Tenure at Major Brands
The average tenure of chief marketing officers at large US advertisers is only 3 years and 4 months, according to recent research from Spencer Stuart. read this »
13 Interview Questions Asked By Successful Business Leaders [Infographic]
This infographic from Resume.io covers 13 favorite interview questions of successful business leaders such as Elon Musk of Tesla and Sara Blakely of Spanks. read this »
LinkedIn's Top Companies to Work for in 2022 [Infographic]
This research from the professional social network ranks companies based on elements of career progression, including ability to advance, company stability, external opportunity, and gender diversity. read this »
The Top Challenges Women Face in Revenue-Generating Roles
Women in revenue-generating roles say compensation is the top challenge they face at work, according to recent research from Women in Revenue. read this »