Question

Topic: Branding

Brand Strategy For White-label Engine

Posted by bigpond on 500 Points
I’m looking for examples of companies that have successfully developed a “brand behind a brand” strategy that positioned them well for acquisition. I'm interested in examples where the company was a service provider and was the engine behind another company who was white-labeling the offering.

The company I work for provides a service product in the security space. They only provide the service through channel partners rather than selling it directly to consumers. It’s a “powered by” model, though not a typical ingredient brand since we provide the entire service itself. It's not just a technology or part of the service so it's not an “Intel inside” or a “BASF – we make them better” approach. It’s a white label proposition where we are the service. We have a good reputation ( A+ BBB rating, high Net Promoter scores and #1 ranking by an industry research firm) though not widely known by the public. Our partners skin the service website with their own brand, and we are in the mix with the "powered by" designation at the bottom.

Ultimately, we are looking to be acquired in the next few years, so the brand strategy must be one that increases the overall valuation while making us a good acquisition target. My approach would be different if we had years to build a brand and were looking to hang around and be the leader in this space. But we’re not. We’re simply trying to build enough value to be an interesting acquisition target.

I’m trying to figure out the best brand strategy and then naming architecture strategy for this situation given our small size and limited resources and so would appreciate examples of companies that have successfully done this and their stories of how.

Logically, it seems that we should just focus on increasing awareness with our partners and not worry about educating the consumers since we are white-labeled. But the consumer engagement is what will provide the value to the service. We need to build that awareness and appreciation for the product with the end-user so the partners providing the the service value it and continue offering it. The partners are buying and providing it to their customers, so they need to see that their customers value the service. Customer Engagement = Value to partners.

How does one effectively build awareness for a behind the scenes brand? And then based on those decisions, what is the optimal naming strategy/architecture for the products and suites of services?

If we are creating value by being the engine behind the brand, it seems like we should be more prominent and less behind the scenes. If so, then the brand strategy should be monolithic, and focused on the company name. Yet if we are trying to be behind the scenes with our partners and create value in the product itself for an acquisition exit, then we should develop the product line brand rather than the company brand. Since the channel partners pay for it and place their own brand in front of the product names, the product is the more enduring part of this play.

It feels rather circular and I'm not sure how to proceed.

Your thoughts, experiences and examples of companies that have successfully pulled this off would be greatly appreciated.
To continue reading this question and the solution, sign up ... it's free!

RESPONSES

  • Posted by peg on Accepted
    Let's begin with some clarification.

    1. If you want to sell your company, then your target market is companies that need/want an acquisition in your business category. Not consumers. Consumers won't buy your company, and their knowledge of your company will not create demand among acquirers. You can get much better results for far less money using a B2B strategy.

    2. Your company's existing relationships with partner companies is a very important asset. If you remove the veil of your white label and tell consumers that you are the real power behind their brands (undercut their image), you will very likely damage those relationships, potentially lowering the value of your company.

    3. Focus on your financials. Nothing romances a potential buyer like a strong balance sheet and a history of profitability. Think of your financial statements as your product .... everything you do should enhance them. Sign up as many new white label customers as you can to add value to your business.

    4. An acquiring company will be interested in putting their brand on your company. They will have to spend time and money to undo any branding you may do -- a negative for you at the negotiating table. Conversely, if it won't cost them a lot to re-brand your company, that's a very strong selling point and an advantage over another acquisition they might be considering. Make it easy to buy your company, not hard or expensive.

    Having said that, here are some next steps:

    1. Focus directly on what you really need: A buyer. Your prime target market should be successful companies that are technology driven and understand the white label business. GoDaddy (which runs a huge white label hosting service) and Travelocity (which runs a big white label travel service) are two such examples.

    2. Secondly, target other businesses that are capable of absorbing a white label business: B2B marketers in categories you may not have considered such as big-box office supply chains, commercial insurers, computer repair networks, etc. Alternately, consider some of your existing retail partners; if one or more have deep pockets, they should also go on your list of targeted potential buyers.

    3. While many consultants may be able to help you with strategy, a good, solid PR specialist -- one who already has connections in the business media, and understands both the tech arena and the mergers-and-acquisitions point of view -- can be your mainstay. They can guide you through the process of elevating awareness of your company -- a great investment for a company in your position. Get the best person you can afford.

    4. As to your question, you're probably not going to find the perfect case study blue-print on a white label acquisition that suits your company, because every company is different. Furthermore, those who acquire companies don't do it for reasons you might find in such a case study; they buy companies to satisfy their own needs. You can't create acquirers; but you can create the best possible product (a valuable company). Again, rely on a seasoned public relations consultant who has been down this path before as your guide to positioning yourself for attention.

    5. To solve your problem of retaining white label partners (by enhancing their consumers' views of your service), get busy winning awards, accolades, and top ratings for your security service; then create emblems or medallions that partners can install on their walls and websites. That way, partners can say promotionally, "We offer the #1 rated Security Whatever on the planet," or "Our Whatever Security Thing: Winner of the Golden Padlock, three years running," etc. They'll have little interest in switching to another service if they've helped to position yours/theirs as great.

    Also, find ways to encourage your partners to feel an emotional investment with your company, not just a financial one. Give them awards, write glowing recommendations on their corporate blogs, appoint their owners to your company's advisory board(s) for a specific topic(s), create a joint task force to work on an industry problem, sponsor the owner's son's soccer team, etc. Again, a good PR pro will now how to lead you in reinforcing loyalty among your partners.

    Bottomline, it actually comes back to basic marketing:
    -- Identify your target audience for acquisition (companies that would potentially be interested in acquiring a business in the security space).
    -- Learn their needs. Survey, read, talk to consultants in the same fields as your target audience.
    -- Position your company as a solution to those needs. A public relations strategy coupled with the ability to generate external chatter about your company, is your best tactic in this regard.
    -- Reinforce your current assets and avoid saddling your potential acquirer with a lot of additional effort or expense.

    Remind your colleagues that acquisition and ongoing business are two entirely separate issues with separate solutions. The end user of acquisition is a business with financial goals and shareholders to satisfy; the end user of the security service is an individual making a consumer purchase. Apples, oranges.

    Hope some of this will help you develop a successful direction for your company. You're so smart to get on this now, a few years before you need the final result. Best of luck to you.


  • Posted by mgoodman on Accepted
    Wow! Peg has hit a home run in her advice to you.

    That said, we have had a lot of experience branding ingredient products/services ... all of it quite successful, and some of it very fast, but with substantial investment. In every case, our clients have preempted partner brands.

    Examples: Stainmaster [Certified] Carpeting (where DuPont only sold the fiber to carpet mills); Intel Inside (where Intel only made the CPUs, not the computers); Qualofill pillows (where the actual fill is just an ingredient, and nobody knows or cares who the manufacturer is); etc.

    The difference, of course, is that each of those examples was for the purpose of influencing consumer behavior and generating high awareness of, and value for, the ingredient. Those are not your problems. So ... listen to Peg.
  • Posted by bigpond on Author
    Thank you Peg for that incredibly thorough and thoughtful response. I appreciate the sage advice. Thanks!!
  • Posted on Accepted
    The intelligently formulated question elicited an equally intelligent response, a "best practices" benchmark for this forum. I just want to add two footnotes to Peg's great answer. The first is that everyone knows about building a network of relationships with customers. But people tend to ignore doing that with the companies out there that focus on BUYING other companies, such as private equity firms.

    Consider doing some homework on what kind of private equity firms could be a good fit for you. Start getting to know some of their partners. Find out what really appeals to them, and to their clients.

    For instance, could having a "China card," or a "software for security robots card" be what adds "jazz and sizzle" to the steak of the good financials for this kind of buyer? Knowing that can play a role in deciding what opportunities to pursue in the course of "packaging yourself" for a future buy-out.

    Focus on firms that a) are as close as possible to you and b) that have done acquistions in your industry. To find them:

    1. - Pratt's Guide of Thomson Reuters lists 20,000 VC, buyout and mezzanine firms. It is the standard reference, quite likely through your public libray (in addition to other relevant databases).

    2. - Prequin Alternative Assets is an interesting newcomer with offices in London, New York and Singapore. Mark O'Hare and Nick Arnott founded the firm, which is owned by its staff, in 2002. It offers profiles on 3,600 VCs, 5,300 private equity firms and 60 sovereign wealth groups. Its services are pricy, so do some due diligence before purchasing.

    The second footnote is about negotiating. Selling your firm could well be one of the largest and most significant negotiations of your professional life. Yet a suprising number of people walk into such sessions with little or no formal training and inadequate preparation. Take a look at the extensive literature out there on negotiation and see if some of those books make sense for you to read.

    Reading does not hurt, but practice is what counts. Take a look at the top end negotiating seminars offered at, among others, Harvard Business School and Wharton - pricy, but they do a good job.

    At the very least, be sure you video tape your team doing repeated scenarios well before the real negotiations begin.

    Regards,
    JH
  • Posted by bigpond on Author
    thank you all for your excellent suggestions and analysis. Much appreciated and very helpful.

Post a Comment