Question

Topic: Student Questions

(viral) Marketing Theories

Posted by Anonymous on 250 Points
I am currently diving into my Masters Thesis.

The topic is Viral Marketing and its potential to change traditional marketing practices - an international perspective.

I am a bit clueless on what marketing theories would be relevant in relation to viral marketing. I am planning on using the AIDA and DAGMAR models and I have begun to construct a model based mostly on Malcom Gladwell's The Tipping Point. My adviser isnt a Marketing prof so he doesnt have much input for me and says I should find other means of figuring out what to use. So I am hoping that someone here can provide me with some clues of which theories could be used.

I appreciate any help you can give. Thank you in advance.
To continue reading this question and the solution, sign up ... it's free!

RESPONSES

  • Posted by Gary Bloomer on Accepted
    Dear Nic,

    You're probably not going to like this.

    First: Listen to (and answer) Randall's questions. He's one of the top contributors to this forum, and in the short period of time I've been active on this exchange, I've gain the impression that when Randall
    asks a clarifying question, you'd better be damned sure you've done your homework.

    Second: Before you get all fired up about "viral" this or "traditional" that, it's vitally important that you wrap your mind firmly around one, simple, non changing, non negotiable foundation. And note this well because without this foundation, you're floundering.

    Regardless of the latest buzzwords and theories in marketing, until you have identified a need, presented a beneficial and value laden solution, created a relationship, made a sale, and generated customer loyalty, you've got a big fat zero.

    You can theorize until the cows come home and buzzword your way from here to Timbuktu, but until you've got the things I've just pointed out in place ... and producing results, meaning you're seeing the sales curve go up ... your other theories don't really hold water.

    DAGMAR: Defining Advertising Goals for Measured Advertising Results.

    All right. Let's boil this down to its basic goo: The goal of the advertising is to sell the product. The measure of the advertising's result is, did the ad campaign or the marketing bring in more in terms of gross revenue than it cost to produce the stuff?

    If it did, bravo. If it didn't, there's a flaw in the message, there's a flaw in the delivery method, or there's something the audience the message is aimed at are not getting, something they're not understanding.

    But whichever it is, something's wrong. Which means the marketing isn't communicating and that someone is wasting the client's money.

    AIDA(S) has always bugged me because as neatly defined as it is, it leaves out the critical points of relationship and loyalty. Sure, there's often the neat little "S" for "satisfaction" tagged on to the end.

    But satisfaction is NOT loyalty. And AIDA falls a little short when it
    comes to creating any kind of customer relationship and life time customer value. This thought is probably going to upset a lot of
    people but it's what I think, and it's what I've seen to be the case.

    I don't know if there's any one theory that pulls this all together.
    But for my money, WIIFM comes pretty darn close.

    What's in it for me?

    That's the core question the consumer needs you to answer. And your answer had better be world changing and mind boggling. Why should they do business with you? What do they get more of that you're not afraid of over delivering again, and again, and again?

    This is where your loyalty comes in. Give me lots of value, great products at astonishing prices and SOLVE MY PROBLEM in a way that makes me all warm and fuzzy all over to such an extent that
    I tell ALL MY FRIENDS, and you'll have created and gained my brand allegiance.

    Beware of buzzwords and fads. They'll come, go, and date faster than Duran Duran and cargo pants.

    But great service that solves the problem and inspires loyalty? It never goes out of style and it's the life jacket that buoys the brand ... in even the stormiest of seas.

    I hope this helps.

    Gary Bloomer
    Wilmington, DE, USA

  • Posted on Accepted
    Hello!

    I have to say a big thank you to Nic for posting this question and an even bigger thank you to Gary for sharing his view. Its a great contribution!

    I've been through both worlds, done a quantitative thesis and also been working in direct sales.

    What Randall is suggesting is for you to clarify you battlefield. Does the gap that you are hypothesizing existent? I think more importantly- what will your thesis contribute for the future? I had to do a lot of reading and somewhat become a subject matter expert with regards to my area of interest before I can pen down my research question.

    From a sales person point of view, Gary holds the most honest and practical view. That's really what happens at the front line. What is it in for me, does affect how well you can sell, especially in difficult times where everyone is holding tightly to their wallets.

    Good luck Nic!

  • Posted by Jay Hamilton-Roth on Accepted
    Read: Emanuel Rosen's (The Anatomy of Buzz Revisited) for a well-studied analysis of social media/viral marketing. Also, get familiar with Word of Mouth Marketing Association (https://www.womma.org/). Both footnote lots of sources to aid your research.
  • Posted on Author
    Hi All,

    I sincerly thank you for your comments and hope to continue this conversation. I feel you all have great knowledge that you can share and that you can open my eyes to things I have not considered before

    In regards to your posts

    I have considered traditional marketing practices to be those that take place offline and have been around for many years. For example TV, Outdoor, Print, offline WOM, etc.

    I dont beleive that viral marketing should be considered as a traditional marketing practice due to before the internet you could not reach a global audience as you can today. Viral marketing didnt really become a mainstream topic until the mid 90s with hotmail and icq's success. I also do not consider it to be a traditional practice because it is still relativaly new and it seems there is still a ways to go in fully understanding it.

    Viral marketing to me is essentially a trasformation of WOM to an online platform. I see it to be a less expensive way of sending a message to a group of intended receivers. Its faster and has a global reach. Of course just because a marketing campaign is online doesnt mean that it is a successful viral marketing campaign.



  • Posted on Author
    Please do not close this question.
  • Posted on Author
    Thank you everyone for your answers. I was hoping to get more feedback but it appears that interest has been lost. Site admin is encouraging me to close this question as well so I will give in to their demands.

Post a Comment