Question

Topic: Student Questions

Is Advertising Still An Attractive Employer?

Posted by Anonymous on 125 Points
In the realm of a course project for university, I have to start a public debate on a chosen topic.

I want to find out if the advertising industry is still considered an attractive employer. Why or why not is a career in advertising desirable?

Much like any marketing related profession, advertising experienced significant changes over the last decades. Online, mobile, and many other 'new' forms of advertising revolutionised the industry.
In addition, advertising as a profession has become more controversial. Proponents consider it essential for our economy, justified by the commercial results it can create. Still others even consider it a form of art.
On the other end however, some judge it to be unethical and deceptive.

Being professionals who either have direct work experience or have collaborated with agencies, you know the pros and cons of working in advertising. Imagine you were to advise a graduate or young professional - what would be your arguments for and/or against considering a career in advertising (based on your personal opinion).


I am very curious to read varying viewpoints and look forward to your feedback. Your participation will be much appreciated!
To continue reading this question and the solution, sign up ... it's free!

RESPONSES

  • Posted on Accepted
    Interesting question. I've recently had this same discussion regarding Marketing (instead of Advertising).

    Regarding Advertising: Advertising has definitely changed a lot in the past decade or two. Instead of being one-direction (advertiser to consumer), it's now a two-way dialogue. It's true communication, not just broadcasting a point of view to anyone who will read/listen/watch.

    That means the old-timers don't have as much of a built-in advantage as they used to. It's actually a very exciting time to get into advertising IMHO. The digital media (including social media) level the playing field to a large degree, so communication skills are more important than years of experience. That gives newcomers a very exciting reason to get into Advertising.

    On the other hand, Advertising is still about getting an idea across, and the old-timers have learned some important lessons that a newbie might miss. One example is the focus on benefits rather than features, or emotional appeals in addition to functional benefits. Pictures vs. words. They also know how to listen to customers and consumers to learn how they think, what words they use in their brain-chatter, what their attitudes are toward a company or product, etc. Those things are not immediately obvious to newcomers.

    Another consideration is that advertising effectiveness today is far more "measurable," so the industry is driven by analytics more than ever before. If you don't have a flair for analysis, Advertising may not be right for you.

    Finally, Advertising is a very broad industry. A good graphic designer is part of Advertising. So is a copywriter. And a media buyer. And a SEO specialist. And a PPC wizard. And all of them are interrelated, and they all interact with other aspects of Marketing -- sales, packaging, product development, etc.
  • Posted by Moriarty on Accepted
    Let's take this from another angle. Advertising is a much mis-understood art. (If I am allowed to call it that). From what I see in advertising today, many advertisers are making the same mistakes as they were 50 years ago.

    Mr Goodman speaks of analytics - which is fair enough. Now the problem is subtle - is this data valid? Because asking the wrong questions will give you the wrong answers, what's more the piles of data that result still needs analyzing and is made harder by there being little in the way of a trend. That's because the initial question was poorly formed. It wastes time and it wastes money. Forming those initial questions properly is a real art. Forming good questions means that the results of the analytics come through very clearly.

    Bear in mind that the split test so beloved of the internet marketer was devised in the early part of the last century - now over 100 years ago. It is still poorly understood. Glenn Livingstone says that most people test two things twenty times instead of twenty things twice. Understanding why this is will tell you a lot about why advertising is seen as charlatanry by many people!

    It will also tell you why good advertising is actually extremely hard to do, and why it is worth doing well.

    In this respect, advertising is a job for those who don't mind making mistakes. It is a job for those who can learn from their mistakes, and enjoy the feedback they get from the client data.
  • Posted by Peter (henna gaijin) on Accepted
    Advertising has changed, especially if you compare it to the likes of what was shown in Mad Men TV series. A big change is how online ads are much more important now.

    But there still is plenty of advertising going on, which means there is need for people to work in advertising. And change in industries open up opportunities, as many old school advertising people aren't able to make the change to new fangled advertising. So even if advertising as a whole is not growing (it very may well be growing, but I haven't seen numbers to know if it is or not), opportunities are opening up to do new advertising for those that can.

    Would I advise someone to go into advertising? I more base that on the person and their interests. If some part of advertising is something that appeals to them (say the creative side), sure go for it. If you are just going to get rich, well maybe not advertising. Or better yet, don't do it for the money but instead chase a career goal related to an interest.
  • Posted on Author
    Very interesting answers so far - thanks a lot everyone for your input!

    Mr. Goodman mentioned the different jobs/departments that are included in the industry. Considering account/project management - a profession relevant to virtually any industry - what would be the motivation to go into advertising? The comparably low pay that Mr. Donohue implies, as well as possible outside accusations of deceiving consumers are only two of many reasons I have heard that speak against it.

    Or would you, regarding the latter argument, agree that advertising should not be subject to ethical scrutiny?
  • Posted by Jay Hamilton-Roth on Accepted
    Advertising has been around since the first product has been sold. People/campaigns that are unethical has been around almost as long. Some people believe what they're selling is top-notch (but is later proven to be less-so). Some people know what they're selling is so-so (at best) - but they have mouths to feed at home - and make the ethical tradeoff. Everything we experience is ultimately subject to our own ethical scrutiny - it's just that with less time and clever research - we've been trained to trust certain things. Some countries are enforcing ethical advertising (cigarettes in Australia, health/beauty claims in EU, etc.). But if someone were to truly believe in something, and really want to share its benefit, wouldn't advertising be one of the ways to achieve personal satisfaction?
  • Posted on Moderator
    The motivation to go into advertising, as Peter said, has more to do with the individual than it does with advertising itself. Someone who finds consumer behavior interesting will probably like it a lot. Ditto people who enjoy quantitative analysis and gaining insights from data.

    As for the ethical issue: There are ethical and unethical people in every field. There is nothing inherently unethical about advertising. To my way of thinking, this is a bogus issue. If you describe advertising as providing information about a product or service, nobody would think it's unethical. It's only if you misrepresent a product that advertising gets a bad reputation.
  • Posted on Author
    I absolutely agree that advertising is in an of itself nothing unethical. However, these accusations couldn't have come about by chance. I believe that the sheer amount of information today's consumers are exposed to and the possibly many times they have in fact been misled has caused this disenchantment.

    Surely, the argument that advertising is nothing but communicating the benefits of a product/service is valid, yet it might be an oversimplification of the issue. It doesn't prove the opponents wrong - nobody would honestly advertise the potential shortcomings of a product/service they are trying to sell.


    Ethics aside, I have read very interesting arguments why it is attractive to pursue a career in advertising for an individual with according interests.
    Nonetheless, many of the mentioned job aspects could most likely be fulfilled by similar jobs in corporations. So what is it that makes advertising more attractive for the individual? Would you agree that it is mainly symbolic (atmosphere, prestige, ...) rather than functional benefits?
  • Posted on Accepted
    Two-way communication in advertising, is nothing more than a selling point for advertising itself. Today, consumers demand transparency, honesty and ethical conduct from organisations and even entire industries. Which is exactly why the advertising industry claims it values a two-way, interacting dialogue with the consumer. Just to give it the feeling the industry has become transparent, honest and ethical.

    Besides this, the industry has a way of making itself seem important. Companies spend millions of dollars on agencies to develop creative strategies, which is justified by the claims that consumers need to like a brand to purchase a product of that brand. This isn't true. Consumers want a product to do what they expect from it: a computer with a nice processor and a pair of jeans that doesn't tear easily. A great example is the European clothing brand Zara. At has stores throughout the major cities in Europe and has never develop an ad of any sorts.

    I what would attract graduates to advertising, is the fact that it is a creative industry. What they should realise, is that creativity is the driving force behind all successful organisations in all industries. Not only to be found within the job description of a brand strategist.
  • Posted on Moderator
    Regarding "... these accusations couldn't have come about by chance ..."

    They are common across a lot of jobs. Think about salespeople (especially of used cars), lawyers, stockbrokers, private detectives, pawnbrokers, consultants, etc. Advertising isn't unique this way.

    (And don't tell my mother I'm a consultant. She thinks I play piano at the brothel.)
  • Posted on Member
    Good point, Mr. Goodman.

    Varying degrees of ethical accusations are commonplace among many professions and industries. However, a comparison to other jobs can put things into perspective, but does by no means justify the accusations towards advertising. In a sense, that argument would reflect a sort of playground mentality... "...but he started it.
  • Posted on Author
    Thank you for your comments everyone. I will keep the question open for about another 5 days. Any additional comments/opinions/ideas/... are welcome and will be much appreciated!

Post a Comment