Question

Topic: Advertising/PR

Communications For Management Resignation

Posted by jackie on 250 Points
My MNC company has had a number of personnel changes, with the head of the country resigning suddenly. An internal email announcing the change has been sent to employees, but there is no external communications plan; the impact to customers should not be significant. I have been tasked with the external comms plan, but unfortunately I can't get a briefing from anyone.

With the info I have currently, I believe we should prepare reactive statements, then perhaps take a more proactive approach once there is some clarity and something concrete to announce. Is this a fair response?

Also, what are some of the basic Qs that I should consider preparing for the Q&A?
To continue reading this question and the solution, sign up ... it's free!

RESPONSES

  • Posted by Gary Bloomer on Accepted
    Dear Jackie,

    "My MNC company has had a number of personnel changes,
    with the head of the country resigning suddenly."

    Head of the country? Good lord!

    If your situation concerns international and government relations you may want to pull in as many advisors from the offices of the
    country's home secretary, state department, and/or foreign office as possible, so that everyone's on the same page, and so that there's less of a temptation for some underling to give the media something that will cause a frightful stink for someone else (probably you) to have to mop up.

    I agree with Phil: the person coming in to the head honcho's office is what matters, not the person leaving.

    Generally, people have shorter memories than many companies give them credit for and what's thought to be of importance to internal stakeholders is often less important to people looking in.

    When it comes to PR and what's been done and who did it,
    these things can't be changed. But you CAN control people's perceptions for your organization's future.

    Concentrate on positive, future-orientated points and, if pressed
    for more facts (for which read, gossip), consider telling the media that a more detailed statement will be issued in due course.

    This classic European country Foreign Office tactic buys you time to regroup if the pressure's high. You don't have to tell the media when this statement will be issued. Nor do you have to hint to them what you'll say.

    But as a tactic, it gives you control, it buys you time, and sends the message that you're in charge and that you won't be bullied
    into answering questions until you're good and ready.

    Then, when you're ready to make your statement, issue it in writing, make it cover as many short but detailed points as possible, focus on the incoming head, and wish the outgoing person well if it's deemed appropriate.

    I hope this helps.

    Gary Bloomer
    Wilmington, DE, USA
  • Posted by marketbase on Accepted
    Agree with everything noted above, however, you could also cite number of employees and/or locations affected (& note that all have been notified); everyone is continuing to keep their 'nose to the grindstone' and focus on doing their best job for the clients/shareholders, etc.

    As far as Q&A concerned, prepare press review (with basic resume info) re new hire; favorable quotes from previous clients and other professional sources that know her/him, etc.

    Turn a potential sticky situation into a plus!

    Best of luck,
    jag
    MarketBase
  • Posted by jackie on Author
    Thanks for the feedback -- it's very helpful to get a reality check from other comms pros. Part of the challenge of the situation is that no replacement has been designated and things are likely to be uncertain for the next few months. From the advice above, I think that we will stick with a low-key, reactive strategy and monitor what is being said in the market in case we need to step efforts up. Thanks again!

Post a Comment