Question

Topic: Website Critique

Free Concept Review Website

Posted by Anonymous on 250 Points
Hi All,

I just launched a new site, https://www.conceptfeedback.com, and would like to get some feedback of my own.

1. What do you think of the registration process, is "Last Name" a turnoff?
2. What do you think of the layout and design?
3. Any suggestions on how to make it better?

Thanks!!
Andrew
To continue reading this question and the solution, sign up ... it's free!

RESPONSES

  • Posted on Member
    It took me a minute to figure out what the site was for. At first I thought you meant voting business ideas up or down. It wasn't clear that you meant ad campaigns and logos.

    Also, while feedback is good, wouldn't it be more helpful to get feedback from the specific kinds of people you're targeting (rather than random people on a Web site)? To take the lamp ad as an example, what appeals to me won't necessarily appeal to a facilities manager.

    Also there's a typo on the categories page:

    "Concepts are grouped by categories. They're easyier to find and keep organized this way."

    It should say "easier".

    Jodi
  • Posted by Linda Whitehead on Member
    I registered for the site-I don't think that last name is necessary. I think you need some more specific stuff under profile-what the person's position is, how long they have been doing it, and what industry they are in. That would address Jodi's concern-if I post a concept for feedback, that way I can check and see if any of those posting comments are part of my target market. Perhaps when allocating points for commenting on concepts, you could allocate additional points to people who are actually in the target market?

    The home page does need to have more clarity on what the site is really about.

    Unless I am misunderstanding, under Preferences you don't provide the option to receive an email whenever a new concept is posted. You may want to consider this.

    Good Luck
    Linda Whitehead
    ZUZ Marketing
  • Posted by Gary Bloomer on Accepted
    Dear Andrew,

    There's a widely held belief that web pages depend on images to attract people. Images sell. Or so we're told.

    As beliefs go, it's utter tosh. Here's why:

    On web pages, our eyes scan for anchoring context—information that allows us to classify, define, and choose where to go. Information that basically tells us, "there is more here worthy of your time".

    On the whole, images cannot do this because they lack sound. Text, on the other hand, has to be translated into auditory information in the brain before it can be understood. But when it's decoded, text offers higher rates of recall.

    Only when we've tracked down text elements on a web site do we skim deeper, reading subheads, headings, bullet points, and simple, three or four line, short sentence paragraphs that relate to the key elements that drew us to that specific site in the first place.

    Eye tracking surveys reveal that we generally "read" a web page in an F shape. We begin top left, move right, scan to the page centre, head right again, before moving back to the centre and moving left.

    You can read more here:

    www.useit.com/alertbox/reading_pattern.html

    It's fascinating stuff.

    As someone who started out as a classically trained graphic designer,
    I used to think this kind of stuff was crap. Oh, how wrong I was. How young. How ignorant. How stupid.

    I confess, I didn't go into great depth on your site, so I'll limit my comments to the part I did look at.

    Your home page.

    You've got twenty words that describe your site, which is good.

    But it's lost. Marooned. Buried. Hidden below your sign in box.

    I floundered on your site looking for a contextual, type-based link.
    I wasn't looking for it. But somehow, I knew I was searching for something.

    Anything! Some clue to tell me what the site is FOR.

    It took me over 30 seconds to find the text I was hunting for.
    Thirty long, empty, fruitless, soul-crushing seconds.

    Ever listened to the radio?

    Of course you have. I've spent time in a radio studio and the quiet in those soundproof booths is unnerving.

    Why do I mention this? Because on the radio, silence is death.

    Ever listened to the radio and been stunned into really listening by ten seconds or so of dead air? I have. Not good.

    On a website, the equivalent of radio dead air is looking for things you can't bloody well find.

    Your text? The stuff that says:

    "Designed specifically for marketers, graphic designers, and web developers, Concept Feedback provides a simple tool to get free quality feedback."

    Here's a suggestion for you.

    Set up two tests. One that tracks visitor sign ups with things just
    as they are. Then, set up a second test. One that that moves your
    20 words of introductory text up to the top left, above your "1,2,3" speech bubbles.

    Reduce the bubbles in size, move them down the page, and see
    which version pulls better.

    Second thing.

    The long band of blue that fades into black every now and again?
    The one all the way along the top of the page?

    Visually, it's not earning its keep.

    Consider reducing the size of your sign up boxes, going with just first name and e-mail address fields, and put that material in the top blue, black box. Use the space currently filled by your sign in box for rolling testimonials (social proof), or some kind of introductory video.

    Who knows. To other people, the purpose of your site might be as clear as day. But I was confused. On a website, the last thing you want is confusion. Don't focus on the experience. Focus on the user having the experience.

    I hope this helps. Good luck to you.

    Gary Bloomer
    Wilmington, DE, USA

Post a Comment