Question
Topic: Student Questions
My Recomendation Debate!!!
I have recently completed a pilot study on a qualitative basis using in depth interviews, but my assignment requires i make recomendations for an actual study and although i feel my findings are reliable, i still feel a need to recomend elements with a qualitative footing.Is this a correct approach or has the debate on metodology finally been won? Is the sole need of proving credibility ground enough to recomend the use of quantitative methods even when the topic area is clearly much more a qulitative issue? And are there different views for the academic and real world.
Related Discussions
- Off Page
- Marketing Research
- Companies Changed The Strategy Based On Research
- Marketing Targeting Stragety Of A Music Band
- Competition
- Trade Show Actions
- Blackpink - Strengths And Weaknesses
- Qs About Competitor Audit Analysis
- Final Year University Dissertation Question Help!
- Dissertation Ideas Based On Interests
- Search more Know-How Exchange Q&A
Community Info
Top 25 Experts
(Student Questions)
- mgoodman 36,279 points
- Gary Bloomer 32,138 points
- Jay Hamilton-Roth 28,001 points
- Peter (henna gaijin) 23,790 points
- Carl Crawford 22,363 points
- wnelson 21,503 points
- Chris Blackman 10,081 points
- Pepper Blue 8,859 points
- SRyan ;] 8,290 points
- Blaine Wilkerson 7,890 points
- steven.alker 6,430 points
- SteveByrneMarketing 6,267 points
- telemoxie 6,160 points
- bobhogg 4,824 points
- MANSING 4,819 points
- Levon 4,419 points
- Mushfique Manzoor 4,218 points
- Corpcommer 3,952 points
- darcy.moen 3,605 points